Bilingualism Influences Inhibitory Control in Auditory Comprehension

Overview

Journal Cognition

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Psychology

Date 2010 Dec 17

PMID 21159332

Citations 82

Authors

Henrike K Blumenfeld

Viorica Marian

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Bilinguals have been shown to outperform monolinguals at suppressing task-irrelevant information. The present study aimed to identify how processing linguistic ambiguity during auditory comprehension may be associated with inhibitory control. Monolinguals and bilinguals listened to words in their native language (English) and identified them among four pictures while their eye-movements were tracked. Each target picture (e.g., hamper) appeared together with a similar-sounding within-language competitor picture (e.g., hammer) and two neutral pictures. Following each eye-tracking trial, priming probe trials indexed residual activation of target words, and residual inhibition of competitor words. Eye-tracking showed similar within-language competition across groups; priming showed stronger competitor inhibition in monolinguals than in bilinguals, suggesting differences in how inhibitory control was used to resolve within-language competition. Notably, correlation analyses revealed that inhibition performance on a nonlinguistic Stroop task was related to linguistic competition resolution in bilinguals but not in monolinguals. Together, monolingual-bilingual comparisons suggest that cognitive control mechanisms can be shaped by linguistic experience.

Citing Articles

Working Memory as the Focus of the Bilingual Effect in Executive Functions.

Chen J, Li Z, Xiong Z, Liu G Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001765 PMC: 11851412. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020134.

Understanding language processing in variable populations on their own terms: Towards a functionalist psycholinguistics of individual differences, development, and disorders.

McMurray B, Baxelbaum K, Colby S, Tomblin J Appl Psycholinguist. 2024; 44(4):565-592.

PMID: 39072293 PMC: 11280349. DOI: 10.1017/s0142716423000255.

To Bilingualism and Beyond! Modeling Bilingualism Requires Looking Beyond Language: A Commentary on "Computational Modeling of Bilingual Language Learning: Current Models and Future Directions".

Marian V Lang Learn. 2024; 73(Suppl 2):74-77.

PMID: 38385119 PMC: 10881204. DOI: 10.1111/lang.12530.

The Lexicon and Morphosyntax of Child Spanish as Predictors of Inhibition.

Grinstead J, Sorine N Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38247665 PMC: 10812907. DOI: 10.3390/bs14010012.

The impact of bilingualism in within-language conflict resolution: an ERP study.

Andras F, Ramos M, Macizo P Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1173486.

PMID: 37303909 PMC: 10248526. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1173486.

References

Connelly S, Hasher L . Aging and the inhibition of spatial location. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993; 19(6):1238-50. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.6.1238. View

Linck J, Kroll J, Sunderman G . Losing access to the native language while immersed in a second language: evidence for the role of inhibition in second-language learning. Psychol Sci. 2009; 20(12):1507-15. PMC: 2858781. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02480.x. View

Marian V, Blumenfeld H, Kaushanskaya M . The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50(4):940-67. DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067). View

Costa A, Hernandez M, Costa-Faidella J, Sebastian-Galles N . On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: now you see it, now you don't. Cognition. 2009; 113(2):135-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001. View

Tipper S . The negative priming effect: inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985; 37(4):571-90. DOI: 10.1080/14640748508400920. View

Luce P, Pisoni D . Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear. 1998; 19(1):1-36. PMC: 3467695. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001. View

Emmorey K, Borinstein H, Thompson R, Gollan T . Bimodal bilingualism. Biling (Camb Engl). 2008; 11(1):43-61. PMC: 2600850. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728907003203. View

Prior A, MacWhinney B . A bilingual advantage in task switching. Biling (Camb Engl). 2022; 13(2):253-262. PMC: 9724810. DOI: 10.1017/S1366728909990526. View

Bialystok E . Effect of bilingualism and computer video game experience on the Simon task. Can J Exp Psychol. 2006; 60(1):68-79. DOI: 10.1037/cjep2006008. View

10.

Yee E, Sedivy J . Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006; 32(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1. View

11.

Marslen-Wilson W . Functional parallelism in spoken word-recognition. Cognition. 1987; 25(1-2):71-102. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0277(87)90005-9. View

12.

Treccani B, Argyri E, Sorace A, Della Sala S . Spatial negative priming in bilingualism. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009; 16(2):320-7. DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.2.320. View

13.

Szekely A, Jacobsen T, DAmico S, Devescovi A, Andonova E, Herron D . A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. J Mem Lang. 2012; 51(2):247-250. PMC: 3446821. DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002. View

14.

Simone P, Ahrens K, Foerde K, Spinetta M . Influence of attended repetition trials on negative priming in younger and older adults. Mem Cognit. 2006; 34(1):187-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193397. View

15.

Colzato L, Bajo M, van den Wildenberg W, Paolieri D, Nieuwenhuis S, La Heij W . How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2008; 34(2):302-12. DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.302. View

16.

Taylor J, OHara R, Mumenthaler M, Rosen A, Yesavage J . Cognitive ability, expertise, and age differences in following air-traffic control instructions. Psychol Aging. 2005; 20(1):117-33. DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.1.117. View

17.

Bialystok E, Shapero D . Ambiguous benefits: the effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures. Dev Sci. 2005; 8(6):595-604. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00451.x. View

18.

May C, Kane M, Hasher L . Determinants of negative priming. Psychol Bull. 1995; 118(1):35-54. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.35. View

19.

Tanenhaus M, Eberhard K, Sedivy J . Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science. 1995; 268(5217):1632-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.7777863. View

20.

Huettig F, Altmann G . Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition. 2005; 96(1):B23-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.10.003. View