» Articles » PMID: 31867724

Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Single Maxillary Gingival Recession Treatment with Connective Tissue Graft and Tunnel or Trapezoidal Flap: 2-year Follow-up

Abstract

Background: The literature lacks long-term evidence regarding outcomes of the coronally advanced tunnel flap (TUN) combined with connective tissue graft (CTG) when compared to the trapezoidal coronally advanced flap (CAF) and CTG combination. This study presents 2-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing CTG combined with either CAF or TUN in the treatment of single maxillary gingival recession (GR) defects.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients, each contributing a single Miller Class I or II GR defect, were treated by CAF+CTG (control; n = 19) or TUN+CTG (test; n = 20) and completed the 2-year follow up. Clinical, patient centered, and esthetic evaluations were performed and differences among groups were analyzed.

Results: At 2 years, mean root coverage for control and test group was 89.5% ± 14.6% and 87.7% ± 18.4%, respectively (P = 0.5). The corresponding complete root coverage prevalence was 68.4% and 50% (P = 0.4). Dentin hypersensitivity significantly decreased for both groups. The two groups showed improvement in esthetics, as assessed by both professionals and patients, without significant intergroup differences (P > 0.5). TUN+CTG sites were much more likely to present improvement in root coverage between 6 months and 2 years, exhibiting creeping attachment of 0.7 ± 0.6 mm.

Conclusions: At 2 years of follow up, both CAF+CTG and TUN+CTG resulted in significant clinical and esthetic improvements and provided similar results in the treatment of single maxillary GRs.

Citing Articles

The effects of vestibular vertical incisions on the tunnel technique: a randomized clinical trial for the treatment of Recession Type 1 single gingival recessions.

Chen Z, Fan K, Xie Y, Zhou S, Zhong J, Ouyang X BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):278.

PMID: 39984958 PMC: 11846288. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05611-4.


Comparison of the efficacy and long-term stability of tunnel technique and coronally advanced flap in the treatment of gingival recession: a Meta-analysis.

Cheng X, Tang R, Ge Z Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023; 41(4):450-462.

PMID: 37474478 PMC: 10372530. DOI: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023045.


Clinical comparison between different surgical techniques used to manage advanced gingival recession (Miller's class III & IV).

Lahham C, Taa M Heliyon. 2022; 8(8):e10132.

PMID: 36033300 PMC: 9404267. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10132.


Treatment of multiple adjacent RT 1 gingival recessions with the modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: 9-year results of a split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Molnar B, Aroca S, Dobos A, Orban K, Szabo J, Windisch P Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26(12):7135-7142.

PMID: 35994126 PMC: 9708797. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04674-9.


Treating Gingival Recessions Using Coronally Advanced Flap or Tunnel Techniques with Autografts or Polymeric Substitutes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Toledano-Osorio M, Munoz-Soto E, Toledano M, Vallecillo-Rivas M, Vallecillo C, Ramos-Garcia P Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(7).

PMID: 35406326 PMC: 9002830. DOI: 10.3390/polym14071453.