» Articles » PMID: 39976848

Biofunctionalization of Silk Fibroin Scaffolds with Enamel Matrix Protein and Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin for Soft Tissue Augmentation: an In-ovo Study

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2025 Feb 20
PMID 39976848
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Silk fibroin (SF) is a biomaterial derived from the cocoon of the mulberry silkworm. This study aimed to assess the capacity of SF matrices biologized with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (iPRF) or enamel matrix protein (EMP) to modulate angiogenesis and immune response in the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay.

Methods: 300 eggs were divided into the following groups: CM + NaCl, CM + iPRF, CM + EMP, SF + NaCl, SF + iPRF, and SF + EMP. Matrices were applied to the CAM on embryonic development day (EDD) 7 after rehydration. Angiogenesis, represented by vascularized area, vessel density, and vessel junctions, was evaluated on EDD 10, 12, and 14. Additionally, gene expression of HIF-1ɑ, VEGF, MMP-13, and NOS2 was assessed via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on EDD 11 and 14.

Results: The number of vascularized specimens was notably higher in SF matrices regardless of the treatment applied, while in the CM group, only matrices biofunctionalized with iPRF demonstrated vascularization. On EDD 14, the CM + iPRF group exhibited the highest values for total vascularized area (CM + iPRF: 57.52%, SF + iPRF: 21.87%, p < 0.001), vessel density (CM + iPRF: 0.0067 μm/µm, SF + iPRF: 0.0032 μm/µm, p = 0.002), number of vessel junctions (CM + iPRF: 14.45, SF + iPRF: 4.82, p = 0.001). Gene expressions displayed high data variability and no significant differences between the groups.

Conclusions: Biofunctionalization with iPRF in CM leads to a high vascularization rate probably through their capability of retaining higher liquid volumes, suggesting improved intraoral wound healing after guided tissue regeneration (GTR). Despite biofunctionalization, SF matrices exhibit a high vascularization, indicating SF as a promising material for GTR.

References
1.
Bassetti R, Stahli A, Bassetti M, Sculean A . Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2016; 20(7):1369-87. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-016-1815-2. View

2.
Griffin T, Cheung W, Zavras A, Damoulis P . Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 2007; 77(12):2070-9. DOI: 10.1902/jop.2006.050296. View

3.
Kyyak S, Blatt S, Pabst A, Thiem D, Al-Nawas B, Kammerer P . Combination of an allogenic and a xenogenic bone substitute material with injectable platelet-rich fibrin - A comparative in vitro study. J Biomater Appl. 2020; 35(1):83-96. DOI: 10.1177/0885328220914407. View

4.
Woloszyk A, Mitsiadis T . Angiogenesis within Stem Cell-Seeded Silk Scaffolds Cultured on the Chorioallantoic Membrane and Visualized by 3D Imaging. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2017; 41:1F.19.1-1F.19.9. DOI: 10.1002/cpsc.27. View

5.
Herrera-Vizcaino C, Dohle E, Al-Maawi S, Booms P, Sader R, Kirkpatrick C . Platelet-rich fibrin secretome induces three dimensional angiogenic activation in vitro. Eur Cell Mater. 2019; 37:250-264. DOI: 10.22203/eCM.v037a15. View