» Articles » PMID: 39972011

Facilitating High Throughput Collections-based Genomics: a Comparison of DNA Extraction and Library Building Methods

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2025 Feb 19
PMID 39972011
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While DNA barcoding methods are an increasingly important tool in biological conservation, the resource requirements of constructing reference libraries frequently reduce their efficacy. One efficient way of sourcing taxonomically validated DNA for reference libraries is to use museum collections. However, DNA degradation intrinsic to historical museum specimens can, if not addressed in the wet lab, lead to low quality data generation and severely limit scientific output. Several DNA extraction and library build methods that are designed to work with degraded DNA have been developed, although the ability to implement these methods at scale and at low cost has yet to be formally addressed. Here, the performance of widely used DNA extraction and library build methods are compared using museum specimens. We find that while our selected DNA extraction methods do not significantly differ in DNA yield, the Santa Cruz Reaction (SCR) library build method is not only the most effective at retrieving degraded DNA from museum specimens but also easily implemented at high throughput for low cost. Results highlight the importance of lab protocol on data yield. An optimised "sample to sequencing" high-throughput protocol which incorporates SCR is included to allow for easy uptake by the wider scientific community.

References
1.
Dabney J, Knapp M, Glocke I, Gansauge M, Weihmann A, Nickel B . Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013; 110(39):15758-63. PMC: 3785785. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1314445110. View

2.
Schubert M, Lindgreen S, Orlando L . AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC Res Notes. 2016; 9:88. PMC: 4751634. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-1900-2. View

3.
Jensen E, Diez-Del-Molino D, Gilbert M, Bertola L, Borges F, Cubric-Curik V . Ancient and historical DNA in conservation policy. Trends Ecol Evol. 2022; 37(5):420-429. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.12.010. View

4.
Okonechnikov K, Conesa A, Garcia-Alcalde F . Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 32(2):292-4. PMC: 4708105. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv566. View

5.
Graves G, Braun M . Museums: storehouses of DNA?. Science. 1992; 255(5050):1335-6. View