Is Native Joint Line More Accurately Restored with Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Than with Conventional Instruments?

Overview

Journal J Orthop Case Rep

Specialty Orthopedics

Date 2025 Feb 17

PMID 39957945

Authors

Pramod Bhor

Sawankumar Pawar

Dnyanada Kutumbe

Arvind Vatkar

Sachin Kale

Rahul Jagtap

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: Changes in joint line (JL) position after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have revealed implant failure, diminished knee function, and altered knee biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to compare the joint line restoration of robotic-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) and conventional TKA (c-TKA).

Materials And Methods: In a prospective cohort study trial, trained fellows performed radiographic analyses on patients receiving RA-TKA (group-1) and c-TKA (group-2) to quantify joint line using the adductor tubercle method. Statistical analysis was used using t-tests, with statistical significance defined as a P < 0.005.

Results: The study contained 150 RA-TKAs and 150 total C-TKAs. Both groups were comparable in demographics such as age, gender, and body mass index. On average, RA-TKAs resulted in a 1.65 ± 0.46 mm shift in the JL position, while C-TKAs resulted in a 2.52 ± 0.52 mm change (P = 0.000). The interclass correlation coefficient between the robotic and conventional groups is around 0.992.

Conclusion: RA-TKA restores the JL position better than C-TKA, which appears to depend on precise planning and ligament balancing, which is attainable with robotic-aided surgery. The clinical relevance of this statistically significant difference requires additional investigation.

References

Vaidya N, Deshpande A, Panjwani T, Patil R, Jaysingani T, Patil P . Robotic-assisted TKA leads to a better prosthesis alignment and a better joint line restoration as compared to conventional TKA: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 30(2):621-626. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06353-2. View

Ponzio D, Lonner J . Preoperative Mapping in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Computed Tomography Scans Is Associated with Radiation Exposure and Carries High Cost. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30(6):964-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.039. View

Shah R, Martinez A, Pedoia V, Majumdar S, Vail T, Bini S . Variation in the Thickness of Knee Cartilage. The Use of a Novel Machine Learning Algorithm for Cartilage Segmentation of Magnetic Resonance Images. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(10):2210-2215. PMC: 7251923. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.07.022. View

Jawhar A, Shah V, Sohoni S, Scharf H . Joint line changes after primary total knee arthroplasty: navigated versus non-navigated. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(10):2355-62. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2580-2. View

Koshire S, Mohanty S, Keny S, Rai A, Rathod T, Kamble P . The influence of joint line restoration on functional outcome after primary total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022; 34:102023. PMC: 9490095. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102023. View

Snider M, MacDonald S . The influence of the posterior cruciate ligament and component design on joint line position after primary total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(7):1093-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.08.009. View

Van Rossom S, Wesseling M, Smith C, Thelen D, Vanwanseele B, Dieter V . The influence of knee joint geometry and alignment on the tibiofemoral load distribution: A computational study. Knee. 2019; 26(4):813-823. PMC: 6906219. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.06.002. View

Babazadeh S, Dowsey M, Swan J, Stoney J, Choong P . Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93(9):1223-31. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26950. View

Luyckx T, Didden K, Vandenneucker H, Labey L, Innocenti B, Bellemans J . Is there a biomechanical explanation for anterior knee pain in patients with patella alta?: influence of patellar height on patellofemoral contact force, contact area and contact pressure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(3):344-50. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21592. View

10.

Iacono F, Presti M, Bruni D, Raspugli G, Bignozzi S, Sharma B . The adductor tubercle: a reliable landmark for analysing the level of the femorotibial joint line. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 21(12):2725-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-012-2113-4. View

11.

van Lieshout W, Valkering K, Koenraadt K, van Etten-Jamaludin F, Kerkhoffs G, van Geenen R . The negative effect of joint line elevation after total knee arthroplasty on outcome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(5):1477-1486. PMC: 6527530. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5099-8. View

12.

Adam C, Eckstein F, Milz S, Putz R . The distribution of cartilage thickness within the joints of the lower limb of elderly individuals. J Anat. 1998; 193 ( Pt 2):203-14. PMC: 1467840. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.1998.19320203.x. View

13.

Cozzarelli N, DeSimone C, DAmore T, Sherman M, Lonner J . Joint line position change in primary total knee arthroplasty: a radiographic analysis comparing conventional and robotic techniques. Int Orthop. 2023; 48(4):1023-1030. PMC: 10933191. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-06031-1. View

14.

Maderbacher G, Keshmiri A, Schaumburger J, Springorum H, Zeman F, Grifka J . Accuracy of bony landmarks for restoring the natural joint line in revision knee surgery: an MRI study. Int Orthop. 2014; 38(6):1173-81. PMC: 4037526. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2292-3. View

15.

Popat R, Albelooshi A, Mahapatra P, Bollars P, Ettinger M, Jennings S . Improved joint line and posterior offset restoration in primary total knee replacement using a robotic-assisted surgical technique: An international multi-centre retrospective analysis of matched cohorts. PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0272722. PMC: 9409519. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272722. View

16.

Negrin R, Duboy J, Reyes N, Barahona M, Iniguez M, Infante C . Robotic-assisted Unicompartmental knee Arthroplasty optimizes joint line restitution better than conventional surgery. J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7(1):94. PMC: 7701039. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00309-8. View

17.

Herry Y, Batailler C, Lording T, Servien E, Neyret P, Lustig S . Improved joint-line restitution in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a robotic-assisted surgical technique. Int Orthop. 2017; 41(11):2265-2271. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-017-3633-9. View

18.

Liow M, Xia Z, Wong M, Tay K, Yeo S, Chin P . Robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty accurately restores the joint line and mechanical axis. A prospective randomised study. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29(12):2373-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.12.010. View