» Articles » PMID: 28913557

Improved Joint-line Restitution in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using a Robotic-assisted Surgical Technique

Overview
Journal Int Orthop
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2017 Sep 16
PMID 28913557
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Joint-line restitution is one objective of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). However, the joint line is often lowered when resurfacing femoral implants are used. The aim of this study was to compare the joint-line height in UKA performed by robotic-assisted and conventional techniques.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study compared two matched groups of patients receiving a resurfacing UKA between 2013 and 2016 by either a robotic-assisted (n = 40) or conventional (n = 40) technique. Each group comprised 27 women and 13 menm wuth a mean age of 69 and 68 years, respectively. Indications for surgery were osteoarthritis (n = 35) and condylar osteonecrosis (n = 5). Two validated radiologic measurement methods were used to assess joint-line height.

Results: Forty UKA (23 medial and 17 lateral) were analysed in each group. Restitution of joint-line height was significantly improved in the robotic-assisted group compared than the control group: +1.4 mm ±2.6 vs +4.7 mm ± 2.4 (p < 0.05) as assessed using method 1, and +1.5 mm ±2.3 vs +4.6 mm ±2.5 (p < 0.05) as assessed using method 2.

Conclusions: Restitution of joint-line height in resurfacing UKA can be improved with robotic-assisted surgery. Improvement in clinical outcome measures must be demonstrated with long-term studies.

Citing Articles

Is Native Joint Line More Accurately Restored with Robotic Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty than with Conventional Instruments?.

Bhor P, Pawar S, Kutumbe D, Vatkar A, Kale S, Jagtap R J Orthop Case Rep. 2025; 15(2):233-238.

PMID: 39957945 PMC: 11823860. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i02.5294.


Robotic Assistance in Simultaneous Bilateral Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 126 Knees Demonstrating Enhanced Radiographic Accuracy and Comparable Safety to Conventional Methods.

Rossi V, Foissey C, Fontalis A, Gaggiotti G, Gaggiotti S, Servien E Arthroplast Today. 2025; 31:101594.

PMID: 39902168 PMC: 11788786. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101594.


Comparative analysis of short-term efficacy between robot-assisted retrograde drilling and arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Chen X, Liu J, Wang T, Zhao Z, Li Y, Cheng X Front Surg. 2024; 11:1404513.

PMID: 38859999 PMC: 11163064. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1404513.


The evolution of robotics: research and application progress of dental implant robotic systems.

Liu C, Liu Y, Xie R, Li Z, Bai S, Zhao Y Int J Oral Sci. 2024; 16(1):28.

PMID: 38584185 PMC: 10999443. DOI: 10.1038/s41368-024-00296-x.


[Evolving indications for partial knee replacement : New aspects].

Theus-Steinmann C, Lustig S, Calliess T Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2024; 53(4):238-245.

PMID: 38498206 DOI: 10.1007/s00132-024-04484-9.