» Articles » PMID: 39954085

Increased Rates of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Hip Hemiarthroplasty with Clindamycin Prophylaxis Compared to Cefazolin

Overview
Date 2025 Feb 15
PMID 39954085
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of clindamycin versus cefazolin in preventing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) in patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty (HA) for femoral neck fractures.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 1,139 patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent HA for femoral neck fractures between January 2017 and October 2023. Patients received either Cefazolin + Gentamicin (n = 1001) or Clindamycin + Gentamicin (n = 138). Propensity score matching was performed at a 6:1 ratio, resulting in 828 patients in the cefazolin group and 138 in the clindamycin group. PJI rates, causative organisms, and mortality were compared. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for potential confounders.

Results: The PJI rate was significantly higher in the clindamycin group compared to the cefazolin group (7.2% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.042). Multivariate analysis confirmed that clindamycin prophylaxis was independently associated with increased PJI risk (adjusted OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 1.16-4.99, p = 0.018). Other independent risk factors for PJI included age (adjusted OR = 1.03 per year, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05, p = 0.045), diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR = 1.76, 95% CI: 1.10-2.81, p = 0.018), and surgery duration (adjusted OR = 1.07 per minute, 95% CI: 1.01-1.16, p = 0.035). Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen, with no significant differences in bacterial distribution between the groups. No significant differences were found in 30-day or 1-year mortality rates.

Conclusion: Clindamycin prophylaxis in hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures is associated with a significantly higher risk of PJI compared to cefazolin. These findings support the preferential use of cefazolin in patients without contraindications and demonstrate the critical need for accurate assessment of reported beta-lactam allergies. Results suggest potential benefit from pre-operative allergy evaluation when feasible, as alternative prophylaxis choices may carry increased infection risk. Further research is needed to explore alternative prophylactic strategies for patients with beta-lactam allergies.

References
1.
Gjertsen J, Fenstad A, Leonardsson O, Engesaeter L, Karrholm J, Furnes O . Hemiarthroplasties after hip fractures in Norway and Sweden: a collaboration between the Norwegian and Swedish national registries. Hip Int. 2014; 24(3):223-30. PMC: 6159838. DOI: 10.5301/hipint.5000105. View

2.
de Haan E, Roukema G, van Rijckevorsel V, Kuijper T, de Jong L . Risk factors for prosthetic joint infections after hemiarthroplasty of the hip following a femoral neck fracture. Injury. 2023; 55(2):111195. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111195. View

3.
Guren E, Figved W, Frihagen F, Watne L, Westberg M . Prosthetic joint infection-a devastating complication of hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. Acta Orthop. 2017; 88(4):383-389. PMC: 5499328. DOI: 10.1080/17453674.2017.1301009. View

4.
Del Toro M, Nieto I, Guerrero F, Corzo J, Del Arco A, Palomino J . Are hip hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty infections different entities? The importance of hip fractures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 33(8):1439-48. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-014-2091-1. View

5.
Rodriguez-Pardo D, Escola-Verge L, Sellares-Nadal J, Corona P, Almirante B, Pigrau C . Periprosthetic Joint Infection Prophylaxis in the Elderly after Hip Hemiarthroplasty in Proximal Femur Fractures: Insights and Challenges. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(4). PMC: 8069667. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10040429. View