Prognostic Factors for Responders of Home-Based Pulmonary Rehabilitation-Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview

Journal Healthcare (Basel)

Specialty Health Services

Date 2025 Feb 13

PMID 39942497

Authors

Chul Kim

Hee-Eun Choi

Chin Kook Rhee

Jae Ha Lee

Ju Hyun Oh

Jun Hyeong Song

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective alternative to center-based PR. However, not all participants exhibit sufficient therapeutic improvement, highlighting the need to identify appropriate candidates to maximize cost-effectiveness. This study aimed to identify the factors associated with favorable outcomes in home-based PR, focusing on the role of digital therapeutics (DTx).

Methods: This secondary analysis used data from a randomized controlled trial. Participants with chronic respiratory disease (CRD) were divided into responders and non-responders based on a change in 6 min walk distance (6MWD) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) representing dyspnea and health-related quality of life. Factors such as baseline 6MWD, DTx use, and pulmonary function were analyzed for their predictive value in improving 6MWD and PROM scores.

Results: Responders, particularly those using DTx, showed significantly greater improvements in 6MWD than non-responders. Participants with a baseline 6MWD under 500 m demonstrated a higher likelihood of exceeding the minimum clinically important difference in 6MWD. DTx use strongly predicted improvements in both 6MWD and PROM scores. The baseline diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide was also a significant factor influencing improvements in the modified Medical Research Council scale.

Conclusions: Responders to 8-week program of home-based PR exhibited a relatively lower baseline health status. Encouraging participants with poorer baseline health could improve adherence to PR and enhance cost-effectiveness. Additionally, improvements in 6MWD and PROM scores were associated with the use of DTx. Considering the functions of DTx, proper supervision for home-based exercise may be crucial for achieving optimal outcomes.

References

Balasubramanian A, Putcha N, MacIntyre N, Jensen R, Kinney G, Stringer W . Diffusing Capacity and Mortality in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022; 20(1):38-46. PMC: 9819262. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202203-226OC. View

Wang C, Lee C, Shin H . Digital therapeutics from bench to bedside. NPJ Digit Med. 2023; 6(1):38. PMC: 10006069. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00777-z. View

Bondarenko J, Babic C, Burge A, Holland A . Home-based pulmonary rehabilitation: an implementation study using the RE-AIM framework. ERJ Open Res. 2021; 7(2). PMC: 8107349. DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00469-2020. View

Selzler A, Simmonds L, Rodgers W, Wong E, Stickland M . Pulmonary rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: predictors of program completion and success. COPD. 2012; 9(5):538-45. DOI: 10.3109/15412555.2012.705365. View

Chung C, Lee J, Lee S, Jo M . Clinical Efficacy of Mobile App-Based, Self-Directed Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e41753. PMC: 10786334. DOI: 10.2196/41753. View

Sahin H, Naz I, Varol Y, Aksel N, Tuksavul F, Ozsoz A . COPD patients with severe diffusion defect in carbon monoxide diffusing capacity predict a better outcome for pulmonary rehabilitation. Rev Port Pneumol (2006). 2016; 22(6):323-330. DOI: 10.1016/j.rppnen.2016.03.003. View

Janjua S, Banchoff E, Threapleton C, Prigmore S, Fletcher J, Disler R . Digital interventions for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021; 4:CD013246. PMC: 8094214. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013246.pub2. View

Vagaggini B, Costa F, Antonelli S, Simone C, De Cusatis G, Martino F . Clinical predictors of the efficacy of a pulmonary rehabilitation programme in patients with COPD. Respir Med. 2009; 103(8):1224-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.01.023. View

Morishita-Katsu M, Nishimura K, Taniguchi H, Kimura T, Kondoh Y, Kataoka K . The COPD assessment test and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire: are they equivalent in subjects with COPD?. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016; 11:1543-51. PMC: 4940016. DOI: 10.2147/COPD.S104947. View

10.

Nici L, Donner C, Wouters E, ZuWallack R, Ambrosino N, Bourbeau J . American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement on pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006; 173(12):1390-413. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200508-1211ST. View

11.

Han S, Choi M, Kim Y, Kim D, Park H, Hong J . Is Age-Predicted Maximal Heart Rate Applicable in Patients With Heart or Lung Disease?. Ann Rehabil Med. 2022; 46(3):133-141. PMC: 9263326. DOI: 10.5535/arm.21181. View

12.

Rochester C, Alison J, Carlin B, Jenkins A, Cox N, Bauldoff G . Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Adults with Chronic Respiratory Disease: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023; 208(4):e7-e26. PMC: 10449064. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1066ST. View

13.

Kim C, Choi H, Rhee C, Song J, Lee J . Efficacy of Digital Therapeutics for Pulmonary Rehabilitation: A Multi-Center, Randomized Controlled Trial. Life (Basel). 2024; 14(4). PMC: 11051347. DOI: 10.3390/life14040469. View

14.

Bourne S, DeVos R, North M, Chauhan A, Green B, Brown T . Online versus face-to-face pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(7):e014580. PMC: 5541506. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014580. View

15.

Al Chikhanie Y, Bailly S, Veale D, Herengt F, Verges S . Predictors of changes in 6-min walking distance following pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients: a retrospective cohort analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 58(2):251-257. PMC: 9980544. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.07059-3. View

16.

Kim C, Song J, Kim S . The Accessibility and Effect of Cardiac Rehabilitation in COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Ann Rehabil Med. 2024; 48(4):249-258. PMC: 11372283. DOI: 10.5535/arm.240021. View

17.

Kim C, Song J, Kim S . Validation of Wearable Digital Devices for Heart Rate Measurement During Exercise Test in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease. Ann Rehabil Med. 2023; 47(4):261-271. PMC: 10475817. DOI: 10.5535/arm.23019. View

18.

Souto-Miranda S, Rodrigues G, Spruit M, Marques A . Pulmonary rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 65(3):101564. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101564. View

19.

Kon S, Canavan J, Jones S, M Nolan C, Clark A, Dickson M . Minimum clinically important difference for the COPD Assessment Test: a prospective analysis. Lancet Respir Med. 2014; 2(3):195-203. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70001-3. View

20.

Uzzaman M, Agarwal D, Chan S, Patrick Engkasan J, Habib G, Hanafi N . Effectiveness of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir Rev. 2022; 31(165). PMC: 9724887. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0076-2022. View