» Articles » PMID: 39936168

Bi+ Identity Visibility and Well-being in the Context of Romantic Relationships

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bi+ people-those who are attracted to multiple gender groups and who use labels such as bisexual, pansexual, queer, or fluid-encounter challenges related to making their identities visible and experience reduced well-being relative to their gay/lesbian and heterosexual peers. In a sample of 450 bi+ participants, we pursue two primary goals. First, we investigate whether the subjective feeling that one's bi+ identity is invisible is associated with lower well-being among bi+ individuals. Second, we identify circumstances under which bi+ people experience lower vs. higher subjective identity invisibility, focusing on the influential role of romantic relationships. We find that subjective visibility is positively associated with well-being, particularly for individuals whose bi+ identities are central to them. Relationship factors supporting a sense of perceived visibility included being in a same-gender relationship and having a gay, lesbian, or bi+ partner. This study contributes to efforts to identify conditions that promote bi+ people's well-being and highlights the importance of attending to the relationship dynamics of bi+ people, an understudied population.

Citing Articles

Bi+ identity visibility and well-being in the context of romantic relationships.

McGorray E, Finkel E, Feinstein B Psychol Sex Orientat Gend Divers. 2025; 11(4):631-640.

PMID: 39936168 PMC: 11810110. DOI: 10.1037/sgd0000628.

References
1.
Schmader T, Sedikides C . State Authenticity as Fit to Environment: The Implications of Social Identity for Fit, Authenticity, and Self-Segregation. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2017; 22(3):228-259. DOI: 10.1177/1088868317734080. View

2.
Hays R, Bjorner J, Revicki D, Spritzer K, Cella D . Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009; 18(7):873-80. PMC: 2724630. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9. View

3.
Drigotas S, Rusbult C, Wieselquist J, Whitton S . Close partner as sculptor of the ideal self: behavioral affirmation and the Michelangelo phenomenon. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999; 77(2):293-323. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.77.2.293. View

4.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J . Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999; 282(18):1737-44. DOI: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737. View

5.
Davila J, Jabbour J, Dyar C, Feinstein B . Bi+ Visibility: Characteristics of Those Who Attempt to Make Their Bisexual+ Identity Visible and the Strategies They Use. Arch Sex Behav. 2018; 48(1):199-211. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-018-1284-6. View