» Articles » PMID: 39928630

Validity of Heart Rate Measurements in Wrist-based Monitors Across Skin Tones During Exercise

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2025 Feb 10
PMID 39928630
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of a wrist-based heart rate (HR) monitor at different exercise intensities across different skin tones.

Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, we compared HR measures from the wrist-based photoplethysmography Fitbit Charge 5 to the Polar H10 chest strap at rest and during the YMCA Protocol using a recumbent cycle ergometer. Participant were grouped into three skin tone categories: light (Fitzpatrick Scale Skin Types 1+2), medium (Types 3+4), and darker skin tone (Types 5+6). HR measures using the Polar chest strap during the exercise test were categorized as <40%, 40-60%, or >60% HR reserve (HRR). Absolute error in beats per minute (bpm) between the two devices was calculated for each measure. A linear mixed effects model was used to assess interaction effects between skin tone and exercise intensity, with participants as the random effect. Bland-Altman plots were used for visual analyses.

Results: Twenty-five participants [mean (SD): 25.8 (1.9) years old; 64% female] were included with 495 observations of simultaneous Fitbit and Polar HR recordings collected during exercise. During exercise, we observed a statistically significant interaction effect between skin tone and exercise intensity. Compared with light skin tone at <40% HRR, mean error was greater for medium skin tone at >60% HRR [mean error (95%CI): 11.8 (5.6-17.9) bpm, p<0.001] and darker skin tone at 40-60% HRR [7.6 (1.7-13.5) bpm, p = 0.011] and >60% HRR [11.7 (5.3-18.0) bpm, p<0.001].

Conclusion: HR measurement error using a wrist-based device was greater with increasing exercise intensity for people with darker skin tones.

References
1.
Jamnick N, Pettitt R, Granata C, Pyne D, Bishop D . An Examination and Critique of Current Methods to Determine Exercise Intensity. Sports Med. 2020; 50(10):1729-1756. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01322-8. View

2.
Pasadyn S, Soudan M, Gillinov M, Houghtaling P, Phelan D, Gillinov N . Accuracy of commercially available heart rate monitors in athletes: a prospective study. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2019; 9(4):379-385. PMC: 6732081. DOI: 10.21037/cdt.2019.06.05. View

3.
Billinger S, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Eng J, Franklin B, Johnson C . Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014; 45(8):2532-53. DOI: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000022. View

4.
Fitzpatrick T . The validity and practicality of sun-reactive skin types I through VI. Arch Dermatol. 1988; 124(6):869-71. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.124.6.869. View

5.
Mezzani A, Hamm L, Jones A, McBride P, Moholdt T, Stone J . Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: a joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary.... Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012; 20(3):442-67. DOI: 10.1177/2047487312460484. View