Fake News, Real Needs: A Qualitative Study on Sino-Japanese Theurgy Fighting

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Date 2025 Feb 7

PMID 39916854

Authors

Qing Gao

Qianqian Fu

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Mainstream fake news research has previously mostly focused on authenticity but often overlooked the individual psychological needs and actual social issues behind fake news. These limitations impede a profound understanding of its societal intricacies. This study aims to excavate deeper into the latent significance of fake news, peering through its lens to unearth hidden group psychology and realistic needs. Comments about "Sino-Japanese theurgy fighting" (purportedly a fight between Chinese Taoist priests and Japanese Yin-Yang masters) on Chinese TikTok was selected to conduct content analysis and erect a theoretical model using Grounded Theory. Based on the analysis of 1933 valid comments from 29 videos, it is found that support for fake news correlates not just with judgment of authenticity, but also with psychological needs such as emotional catharsis and position identification. This shift in research perspective enriches our comprehension and offers a novel angle for addressing fake news. This finding reflects the attitudes and behavior patterns of social groups in specific situations and are of great significance for understanding the formation and dissemination of public opinion. Thus, in this special "post-truth" era, emotion regulation and fact clarification are equally essential.

References

Collingridge D, Gantt E . The Quality of Qualitative Research. Am J Med Qual. 2019; 34(5):439-445. DOI: 10.1177/1062860619873187. View

Le M . The spread of fake news: Disclosure willingness role. Heliyon. 2024; 10(14):e34468. PMC: 11331734. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34468. View

Robertson C, Pretus C, Rathje S, Harris E, Van Bavel J . How social identity shapes conspiratorial belief. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022; 47:101423. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101423. View

Pennycook G, Rand D . Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2018; 188:39-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011. View

Bago B, Rand D, Pennycook G . Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020; 149(8):1608-1613. DOI: 10.1037/xge0000729. View

Hsu T, Niiya Y, Thelwall M, Ko M, Knutson B, Tsai J . Social media users produce more affect that supports cultural values, but are more influenced by affect that violates cultural values. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2021; 121(5):969-983. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000282. View

Madill A, Jordan A, Shirley C . Objectivity and reliability in qualitative analysis: realist, contextualist and radical constructionist epistemologies. Br J Psychol. 2000; 91 ( Pt 1):1-20. DOI: 10.1348/000712600161646. View

Scheufele D, Krause N . Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(16):7662-7669. PMC: 6475373. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. View

Ruppel P, Mey G . Grounded theory methodology--narrativity revisited. Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2015; 49(2):174-86. DOI: 10.1007/s12124-015-9301-y. View

10.

Sindermann C, Elhai J, Moshagen M, Montag C . Age, gender, personality, ideological attitudes and individual differences in a person's news spectrum: how many and who might be prone to "filter bubbles" and "echo chambers" online?. Heliyon. 2020; 6(1):e03214. PMC: 7002846. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03214. View

11.

Moore J, Magee S, Gamreklidze E, Kowalewski J . Social Media Mourning: Using Grounded Theory to Explore How People Grieve on Social Networking Sites. Omega (Westport). 2017; 79(3):231-259. DOI: 10.1177/0030222817709691. View

12.

Hamed S, Ab Aziz M, Yaakub M . A review of fake news detection approaches: A critical analysis of relevant studies and highlighting key challenges associated with the dataset, feature representation, and data fusion. Heliyon. 2023; 9(10):e20382. PMC: 10539669. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20382. View

13.

Freiling I, Krause N, Scheufele D, Brossard D . Believing and sharing misinformation, fact-checks, and accurate information on social media: The role of anxiety during COVID-19. New Media Soc. 2023; 25(1):141-162. PMC: 9805917. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211011451. View

14.

Harambam J, Grusauskaite K, de Wildt L . Poly-truth, or the limits of pluralism: Popular debates on conspiracy theories in a post-truth era. Public Underst Sci. 2022; 31(6):784-798. PMC: 9344487. DOI: 10.1177/09636625221092145. View

15.

Bonnefon J, Rahwan I . Machine Thinking, Fast and Slow. Trends Cogn Sci. 2020; 24(12):1019-1027. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.007. View

16.

Evans J . In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003; 7(10):454-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.012. View

17.

Lawson M, Anand S, Kakkar H . Tribalism and tribulations: The social costs of not sharing fake news. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023; 152(3):611-631. DOI: 10.1037/xge0001374. View

18.

Brubacher L . Integrating emotion-focused therapy with the Satir model. J Marital Fam Ther. 2006; 32(2):141-53. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2006.tb01596.x. View

19.

Assarroudi A, Heshmati Nabavi F, Armat M, Ebadi A, Vaismoradi M . Directed qualitative content analysis: the description and elaboration of its underpinning methods and data analysis process. J Res Nurs. 2021; 23(1):42-55. PMC: 7932246. DOI: 10.1177/1744987117741667. View

20.

Kleinheksel A, Rockich-Winston N, Tawfik H, Wyatt T . Demystifying Content Analysis. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020; 84(1):7113. PMC: 7055418. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe7113. View