The Spread of Fake News: Disclosure Willingness Role

Overview

Journal Heliyon

Specialty Social Sciences

Date 2024 Aug 20

PMID 39161722

Authors

Minh T H Le

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The epidemic has had a profound negative impact on individuals worldwide, leading to pervasive anxiety, fear, and mental instability. Exploiting these fears, a significant amount of fake information proliferates and spreads rapidly on social networks. This study explores the factors that cause individuals to believe fake news under stressful and fearful conditions by applying the truth-default theory. Data was collected online in Vietnam, using Smart PLS software to analyze the research model. The findings indicated that risk perception, media trust, trust in celebrity posts, and stress were factors that urge users to believe news posted on social media, and even they actively share this news on their own channels. Disclosure willingness moderated the relationship between adoption fake news and sharing it. Both theoretical and practical implications were discussed.

Citing Articles

Fake news, real needs: A qualitative study on Sino-Japanese theurgy fighting.

Gao Q, Fu Q Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e42255.

PMID: 39916854 PMC: 11795794. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42255.

References

Xu T, Sattar U . Conceptualizing COVID-19 and Public Panic with the Moderating Role of Media Use and Uncertainty in China: An Empirical Framework. Healthcare (Basel). 2020; 8(3). PMC: 7551926. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare8030249. View

Lewandowsky S, Ecker U, Seifert C, Schwarz N, Cook J . Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2015; 13(3):106-31. DOI: 10.1177/1529100612451018. View

Mukherjee M, Maity C, Chatterjee S . Media use pattern as an indicator of mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic: Dataset from India. Data Brief. 2021; 34:106722. PMC: 7811030. DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.106722. View

Deng Z, Liu S . Understanding consumer health information-seeking behavior from the perspective of the risk perception attitude framework and social support in mobile social media websites. Int J Med Inform. 2017; 105:98-109. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.014. View

Wang X, Chao F, Yu G, Zhang K . Factors influencing fake news rebuttal acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic and the moderating effect of cognitive ability. Comput Human Behav. 2022; 130:107174. PMC: 8719053. DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107174. View

Radwan E, Radwan A, Radwan W . The role of social media in spreading panic among primary and secondary school students during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online questionnaire study from the Gaza Strip, Palestine. Heliyon. 2020; 6(12):e05807. PMC: 7758520. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05807. View

Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S . The spread of true and false news online. Science. 2018; 359(6380):1146-1151. DOI: 10.1126/science.aap9559. View

Niemiec E . COVID-19 and misinformation: Is censorship of social media a remedy to the spread of medical misinformation?. EMBO Rep. 2020; 21(11):e51420. PMC: 7645258. DOI: 10.15252/embr.202051420. View

Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C . The risk perception paradox--implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal. 2013; 33(6):1049-65. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x. View

10.

Gao J, Zheng P, Jia Y, Chen H, Mao Y, Chen S . Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. PLoS One. 2020; 15(4):e0231924. PMC: 7162477. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231924. View

11.

Obada D, Dabija D . "In Flow"! Why Do Users Share Fake News about Environmentally Friendly Brands on Social Media?. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(8). PMC: 9032519. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19084861. View

12.

Sindermann C, Schmitt H, Rozgonjuk D, Elhai J, Montag C . The evaluation of fake and true news: on the role of intelligence, personality, interpersonal trust, ideological attitudes, and news consumption. Heliyon. 2021; 7(3):e06503. PMC: 8035512. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06503. View

13.

Kaminski M, Szymanska C, Nowak J . Whose Tweets on COVID-19 Gain the Most Attention: Celebrities, Political, or Scientific Authorities?. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2020; 24(2):123-128. DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0336. View

14.

Brown W, Basil M, Bocarnea M . The influence of famous athletes on health beliefs and practices: Mark McGwire, child abuse prevention, and Androstenedione. J Health Commun. 2003; 8(1):41-57. DOI: 10.1080/10810730305733. View

15.

Iwendi C, Mohan S, Khan S, Ibeke E, Ahmadian A, Ciano T . Covid-19 fake news sentiment analysis. Comput Electr Eng. 2022; 101:107967. PMC: 9023343. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.107967. View

16.

Bickerstaff K . Risk perception research: socio-cultural perspectives on the public experience of air pollution. Environ Int. 2004; 30(6):827-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2003.12.001. View

17.

Raza S, Ding C . Fake news detection based on news content and social contexts: a transformer-based approach. Int J Data Sci Anal. 2022; 13(4):335-362. PMC: 8800852. DOI: 10.1007/s41060-021-00302-z. View

18.

Himelein-Wachowiak M, Giorgi S, Devoto A, Rahman M, Ungar L, Schwartz H . Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(5):e26933. PMC: 8139392. DOI: 10.2196/26933. View

19.

Apuke O, Omar B . Fake news and COVID-19: modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telemat Inform. 2021; 56:101475. PMC: 7390799. DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2020.101475. View

20.

Beauvais C . Fake news: Why do we believe it?. Joint Bone Spine. 2022; 89(4):105371. PMC: 9548403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105371. View