Investigating the Effect of Maltodextrins and Degree of Polymerization on Individual Complex Carbohydrate Taste Sensitivity

Overview

Journal Food Sci Nutr

Date 2025 Feb 5

PMID 39906726

Authors

Claudia Hartley

Russell S J Keast

Wender L P Bredie

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Research shows that complex carbohydrates (maltodextrins) can be perceived in the oral cavity independent of sweet taste. However, little is known about individual differences in complex carbohydrate taste sensitivity. Therefore, the relationship between complex carbohydrate structure and individual complex carbohydrate taste sensitivity requires further investigation. This study investigated individual taste sensitivity among adults for maltodextrins with different degrees of polymerization. Participants ( = 37) (BMI (kg/m): 24.29 ± 1.06, age (years): 30.32 ± 1.24) taste perception and oral sensitivity for sour (citric acid), sweet (glucose), and complex carbohydrate (mixture of short chain maltodextrins (SCM, average DP 6) and mixture of long chain maltodextrin (LCM, average DP 20)) were assessed using taste assessment measures (detection threshold (DT) and suprathreshold intensity perception (ST)). Taste assessment measures were performed in a randomized, repeated, blinded design. There were significant correlations between LCM DT, SCM DT, Sour DT, and Sweet DT (all < 0.01). There were further significant correlations between LCM ST, SCM ST and Sweet ST (all < 0.01) and between SCM ST, Sweet ST and Sour ST (all < 0.01). There was a significant effect of sex on DT ranking values ( = 0.050). For the majority of participants, complex carbohydrate sensitivity status did not change according to chain length. This study strengthens existing research that complex carbohydrates can be perceived in the oral cavity and highlighted that for the majority, maltodextrin chain length does not influence complex carbohydrate taste sensitivity (specifically DT and ST).

References

Hartley I, Riis N, Liem D, Keast R . Oral Exposure to Sodium Chloride without Subsequent Consumption Does Not Alter Salt Taste Function in Adults: A Cross-Over Intervention Study. J Nutr. 2023; 153(2):543-551. DOI: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2022.12.010. View

Stewart J, Keast R . Recent fat intake modulates fat taste sensitivity in lean and overweight subjects. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011; 36(6):834-42. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2011.155. View

Arciero P, Goran M, Poehlman E . Resting metabolic rate is lower in women than in men. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1993; 75(6):2514-20. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1993.75.6.2514. View

Hartley C, Carr A, Roberts S, Bredie W, Keast R . Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing, Cycling Performance and Individual Complex Carbohydrate Taste Sensitivity. Nutrients. 2024; 16(3). PMC: 10857552. DOI: 10.3390/nu16030459. View

Hartley C, Carr A, Bowe S, Bredie W, Keast R . Maltodextrin-Based Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing and Exercise Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2022; 52(8):1833-1862. PMC: 9325805. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01658-3. View

McCaughey S, Scott T . The taste of sodium. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998; 22(5):663-76. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(97)00067-5. View

Lim J, Pullicin A . Oral carbohydrate sensing: Beyond sweet taste. Physiol Behav. 2019; 202:14-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.01.021. View

Martin L, Andrewson T, Penner M, Lim J . Taste Detection of Maltooligosaccharides with Varying Degrees of Polymerization. J Agric Food Chem. 2023; 71(17):6699-6705. PMC: 10561598. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00910. View

Costanzo A, Settapramote N, Utama-Ang N, Wanich U, Lewin S, Keast R . Carbohydrate Taste Is Associated with Food Intake and Body Mass in Healthy Australian Adults. Nutrients. 2021; 13(11). PMC: 8619819. DOI: 10.3390/nu13113844. View

10.

Alberti-Fidanza A, Fruttini D, Servili M . Gustatory and food habit changes during the menstrual cycle. Int J Vitam Nutr Res. 1998; 68(2):149-53. View

11.

. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2001; 894:i-xii, 1-253. View

12.

Geer E, Shen W . Gender differences in insulin resistance, body composition, and energy balance. Gend Med. 2009; 6 Suppl 1:60-75. PMC: 2908522. DOI: 10.1016/j.genm.2009.02.002. View

13.

Zhao G, Zhang Y, Hoon M, Chandrashekar J, Erlenbach I, Ryba N . The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell. 2003; 115(3):255-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00844-4. View

14.

Nelson G, Hoon M, Chandrashekar J, Zhang Y, Ryba N, Zuker C . Mammalian sweet taste receptors. Cell. 2001; 106(3):381-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00451-2. View

15.

Stewart J, Feinle-Bisset C, Golding M, Delahunty C, Clifton P, Keast R . Oral sensitivity to fatty acids, food consumption and BMI in human subjects. Br J Nutr. 2010; 104(1):145-52. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114510000267. View

16.

FEIGIN M, Sclafani A, Sunday S . Species differences in polysaccharide and sugar taste preferences. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1987; 11(2):231-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0149-7634(87)80031-3. View

17.

Hartley I, Liem D, Keast R . Umami as an 'Alimentary' Taste. A New Perspective on Taste Classification. Nutrients. 2019; 11(1). PMC: 6356469. DOI: 10.3390/nu11010182. View

18.

HETTINGER T, Frank M, MYERS W . Are the tastes of polycose and monosodium glutamate unique?. Chem Senses. 1996; 21(3):341-7. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/21.3.341. View

19.

Low J, Lacy K, McBride R, Keast R . The Associations Between Oral Complex Carbohydrate Sensitivity, BMI, Liking, and Consumption of Complex Carbohydrate Based Foods. J Food Sci. 2018; 83(8):2227-2236. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14276. View

20.

Hartley I, Costanzo A, Liem D, Keast R . Glutamate-Sodium Discrimination Status in Adults Is Associated with Salt Recognition Threshold and Habitual Intake of Discretionary Food and Meat: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(17). PMC: 9518332. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191711101. View