» Articles » PMID: 39899711

Evidence for Domain-general Arousal from Semantic and Neuroimaging Meta-analyses Reconciles Opposing Views on Arousal

Overview
Date 2025 Feb 3
PMID 39899711
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Arousal refers to changes in brain-body state underpinning motivated behavior but lacks a proper definition and taxonomy. Neuroscience and psychology textbooks offer surprisingly different views on what arousal is, from a global brain-wide modulation of neuronal activity to a multidimensional construct, with specific brain-body patterns tuned to a given situation. The huge number of scientific articles mentioning arousal (~50,000) highlights the importance of the concept but also explains why such a vast literature has never been systematically reviewed so far. Here, we leverage the tools of natural language processing to probe the nature of arousal in a data-driven, comprehensive manner. We show that arousal comes in seven varieties: cognitive, emotional, physiological, sexual, related to stress disorders, to sleep, or to sleep disorders. We then ask whether domain-general arousal exists at the cortical level, and run meta-analyses of the brain imaging literature to reveal that all varieties of arousal, except arousal in sleep disorders for lack of data, converge onto a cortical network composed of the presupplementary motor area and the left and right dorsal anterior insula. More precisely, we find that activity in dysgranular insular area 7 (Jülich atlas), the region with the highest convergence across varieties of arousal, is also specifically associated with arousal. The domain-general arousal network might trigger the reorganization of large-scale brain networks-a global mechanism-resulting in a context-specific configuration-in line with the multidimensional view. Future taxonomies of arousal refining the alignment between concepts and data should include domain-general arousal as a central component.

Citing Articles

Evidence for domain-general arousal from semantic and neuroimaging meta-analyses reconciles opposing views on arousal.

Sabat M, de Dampierre C, Tallon-Baudry C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(6):e2413808122.

PMID: 39899711 PMC: 11831115. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2413808122.

References
1.
Nilsson M, Kalckert A . Region-of-interest analysis approaches in neuroimaging studies of body ownership: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis. Eur J Neurosci. 2021; 54(11):7974-7988. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15534. View

2.
Khazaie H, Veronese M, Noori K, Emamian F, Zarei M, Ashkan K . Functional reorganization in obstructive sleep apnoea and insomnia: A systematic review of the resting-state fMRI. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017; 77:219-231. PMC: 6167921. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.03.013. View

3.
Voytek J, Voytek B . Automated cognome construction and semi-automated hypothesis generation. J Neurosci Methods. 2012; 208(1):92-100. PMC: 3376233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2012.04.019. View

4.
Chang L, Yarkoni T, Khaw M, Sanfey A . Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cereb Cortex. 2012; 23(3):739-49. PMC: 3563343. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhs065. View

5.
Sabat M, de Dampierre C, Tallon-Baudry C . Evidence for domain-general arousal from semantic and neuroimaging meta-analyses reconciles opposing views on arousal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(6):e2413808122. PMC: 11831115. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2413808122. View