Does Double Cryopreservation As Well As Double Biopsy Affect Embryo Viability and Clinical Outcomes? Evidence from a Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Date 2025 Feb 1

PMID 39893354

Authors

Alessandro Bartolacci

Carmine Vitiello

Sofia de Girolamo

Enrico Papaleo

Luca Pagliardini

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of double cryopreservation and re-biopsy on embryo viability and clinical outcomes. Studies of interest were selected from an initial cohort of 1027 potentially relevant records retrieved. PubMed was systematically searched for peer-reviewed original papers identified by keywords and medical subject heading terms. Moreover, we elaborated the evidence tables for double cryopreservation and re-biopsy separately. Data were systematically extracted, focusing on live birth, survival, clinical pregnancy, and miscarriage rates. For each study, we identified absolute numbers (numerator and denominator) related to clinical outcomes. Finally, for each outcome, we calculated the percentage change between the control and study groups. Among studies on double cryopreservation, 13 out of 22 reported no effect on clinical outcomes, suggesting contradictory results. Similarly, findings on re-biopsy were controversial, with seven out of 12 studies showing negative effects on survival and clinical outcomes, while five reported no impact. In our analysis of the evidence tables, we observed a reduction in live birth rates of 22.2% and 39.3% in blastocysts undergoing double vitrification and re-biopsy, respectively. These findings suggest that repeated micromanipulations can impair embryo competence. Therefore, double cryopreservation and re-biopsy should be limited in the selected cases without other options by consulting patients about the possible harmful effects.

References

Trounson A . Cryopreservation. Br Med Bull. 1990; 46(3):695-708. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072425. View

Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P . Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(8):1685-95. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew127. View

Shapiro B, Daneshmand S, Garner F, Aguirre M, Hudson C, Thomas S . Evidence of impaired endometrial receptivity after ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a prospective randomized trial comparing fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in normal responders. Fertil Steril. 2011; 96(2):344-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.050. View

Le T, Ong P, Nguyen Q, Roque M . Fresh elective frozen embryo transfer: Cumulative live birth rates of 7,236 IVF cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2022; 26(3):450-459. PMC: 9355431. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20210094. View

Baradaran Bagheri R, Bazrafkan M, Sabour A, Ataei M, Badehnoosh B, Mashak B . The comparison of pregnancy outcomes in fresh and frozen embryo transfer: A cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2023; 21(7):551-556. PMC: 10505699. DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i7.13891. View

Bosdou J, Venetis C, Tarlatzis B, Grimbizis G, Kolibianakis E . Higher probability of live-birth in high, but not normal, responders after first frozen-embryo transfer in a freeze-only cycle strategy compared to fresh-embryo transfer: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(3):491-505. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey388. View

Ferraretti A, Nygren K, Nyboe Andersen A, de Mouzon J, Kupka M, Calhaz-Jorge C . Trends over 15 years in ART in Europe: an analysis of 6 million cycles. Hum Reprod Open. 2019; 2017(2):hox012. PMC: 6276702. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hox012. View

Edgar D, Gook D . A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(5):536-54. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms016. View

Lassalle B, Testart J, Renard J . Human embryo features that influence the success of cryopreservation with the use of 1,2 propanediol. Fertil Steril. 1985; 44(5):645-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48981-8. View

10.

Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo S . Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 11(3):300-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60837-1. View

11.

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera A, Kaser D, Ubaldi F . Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2016; 23(2):139-155. PMC: 5850862. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmw038. View

12.

Liebermann J . Vitrification: A Simple and Successful Method for Cryostorage of Human Blastocysts. Methods Mol Biol. 2020; 2180:501-515. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0783-1_24. View

13.

De Rycke M, Goossens V, Kokkali G, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Coonen E, Moutou C . ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIV-XV: cycles from January 2011 to December 2012 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2013. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(10):1974-1994. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex265. View

14.

Strom D, Feinberg E . Embryo transfer-the who, what, when, how, and why does it matter?. Fertil Steril. 2022; 118(5):813-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.016. View

15.

Katler Q, Kawwass J, Hurst B, Sparks A, McCulloh D, Wantman E . Vanquishing multiple pregnancy in in vitro fertilization in the United States-a 25-year endeavor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 227(2):129-135. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.02.005. View

16.

Farquhar C . Avoiding multiple pregnancies in assisted reproductive technologies: transferring one embryo at a time should be the norm. Fertil Steril. 2020; 114(4):671-672. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1404. View

17.

Makieva S, Sachs M, Xie M, Velasco A, El-Hadad S, Kalaitzopoulos D . Double vitrification and warming does not compromise the chance of live birth after single unbiopsied blastocyst transfer. Hum Reprod Open. 2023; 2023(4):hoad037. PMC: 10576635. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad037. View

18.

Mizobe Y, Kuwatsuru Y, Kuroki Y, Fukumoto Y, Tokudome M, Moewaki H . The effect of repeated cryopreservation and thawing using cryotip on the clinical outcomes of embryos. Reprod Med Biol. 2021; 20(2):176-181. PMC: 8022090. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12365. View

19.

Oraiopoulou C, Karagianni M, Papatheodorou A, Toumpa O, Papadopoulou M, Christophoridis N . Double vitrification of embryos adversely affects clinical outcomes. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2024; 28(3):399-404. PMC: 11349271. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20240014. View

20.

Hallamaa M, Seikkula J, Willman S, Ollila H, Jokimaa V . Pregnancy potential and perinatal outcomes of embryos cryopreserved twice: a case-control study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 43(4):607-613. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.06.028. View