Fresh Elective Frozen Embryo Transfer: Cumulative Live Birth Rates of 7,236 IVF Cycles

Overview

Journal JBRA Assist Reprod

Specialty Reproductive Medicine

Date 2022 Feb 22

PMID 35191632

Authors

Thi Minh Chau Le

Phuc Thinh Ong

Quoc Anh Nguyen

Matheus Roque

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether elective frozen embryo transfer (eFET), or the 'freeze-all' strategy, associated with better cumulative clinical outcomes compared with fresh embryo transfer (ET).

Methods: A total of 7,236 IVF cycles that were followed by a fresh ET or eFET between 2013 and 2017. The patients were subjected to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol and cleavage-stage ET. Embryo cryopreservation was performed on day 3 by vitrification using an open system. A comparison of cumulative outcomes between the eFET (n=4,065cycles) and the fresh ET groups (n=3,171cycles) were performed. The analysis was performed in four groups of patients based on the number of retrieved oocytes: Group 1: poor responders (1-3 oocytes); Group 2: suboptimal responders (4-9 oocytes); Group 3: normal responders (10-15 oocytes); and Group 4: hyper-responders (>15 oocytes). The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per stimulated cycle.

Results: There were a total of 10,283 ETs (n=5,639 eFET group; n=4,644 fresh group). The freeze-all strategy is associated with improved CLBRs in normal and hyper-responders, but not in suboptimal and poor responders. In Group 1, there were 351 IVF cycles and 387 ETs in total, and the CLBR was 14.3% and 17.7% (p=0.584) for the eFET and fresh group, respectively. In Group 2, there were 2,074 IVF cycles and 2,465 ET in total, and the CLBR was 25.1% and 23.3% (p=0.083) in the eFET and fresh group, respectively. There was a significant difference in the CLBR in Groups 3 and 4, favouring the eFET strategy. In Group 3, 2226 IVF cycles and 3243 ET were performed. The CLBR was 40.5% in the eFET and 36.6% in the fresh group (p<0.001). In Group 4, there were 2547 IVF cycles and 3,188 ET in total, and the CLBR was 52.2% and 47.7% (p<0.001) in the eFET and fresh group, respectively. The number needed to treat to achieve one additional live birth was 25.9 in Group 3 and 22.3 in Group 4.

Conclusions: The implementation of the freeze-all strategy should be individualized. The freeze-all strategy is associated with improved CLBRs in normal and hyper-responders, but not in suboptimal and poor responders.

Citing Articles

Does double cryopreservation as well as double biopsy affect embryo viability and clinical outcomes? Evidence from a systematic review of the literature.

Bartolacci A, Vitiello C, de Girolamo S, Papaleo E, Pagliardini L J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39893354 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-025-03398-5.

To Assess or Not to Assess: Reconsidering Day 3 Embryo Quality in Planned Freeze-All Blastocyst Cycles.

Bartolacci A, Marzanati D, Barbagallo B, Solano Narduche L, DAlessandro G, Esposito S J Pers Med. 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38929846 PMC: 11204659. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14060624.

Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†.

Lundin K, Bentzen J, Bozdag G, Ebner T, Harper J, Le Clef N Hum Reprod. 2023; 38(11):2062-2104.

PMID: 37747409 PMC: 10628516. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dead184.

A randomised control trial on oral dydrogesterone micronized vaginal progesterone pessary for luteal phase support in fertilization cycles.

Ikechebelu J, Dim C, Eleje G, Joe-Ikechebelu N, Okpala B, Okam P J Med Life. 2023; 16(1):62-69.

PMID: 36873122 PMC: 9979184. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2022-0131.

References

Ubaldi F, Bourgain C, Tournaye H, Smitz J, VAN Steirteghem A, Devroey P . Endometrial evaluation by aspiration biopsy on the day of oocyte retrieval in the embryo transfer cycles in patients with serum progesterone rise during the follicular phase. Fertil Steril. 1997; 67(3):521-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(97)80080-5. View

Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R . Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2012; 99(1):156-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003. View

Polyzos N, Sunkara S . Sub-optimal responders following controlled ovarian stimulation: an overlooked group?. Hum Reprod. 2015; 30(9):2005-8. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev149. View

Roque M, Haahr T, Esteves S, Humaidan P . The 'Big Freeze': freeze-all should not be used for everyone. Hum Reprod. 2018; 33(8):1577-1578. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey218. View

Ferraretti A, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Fortini D, Selman H, Feliciani E . Elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos in women at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: efficiency and safety. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14(6):1457-60. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1457. View

Li Z, Wang A, Bowman M, Hammarberg K, Farquhar C, Johnson L . Cumulative live birth rates following a 'freeze-all' strategy: a population-based study. Hum Reprod Open. 2019; 2019(2):hoz004. PMC: 6400239. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoz004. View

Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S . Freeze-all cycle for all normal responders?. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 34(2):179-185. PMC: 5306402. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0834-x. View

Labarta E, Martinez-Conejero J, Alama P, Horcajadas J, Pellicer A, Simon C . Endometrial receptivity is affected in women with high circulating progesterone levels at the end of the follicular phase: a functional genomics analysis. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(7):1813-25. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/der126. View

Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, Zhang H, Wei D, Zhang Y . Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(2):126-136. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705334. View

10.

Kolibianakis E, Bourgain C, Albano C, Osmanagaoglu K, Smitz J, Van Steirteghem A . Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertil Steril. 2002; 78(5):1025-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03323-x. View

11.

Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M, Geber S . Does freeze-all policy affect IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 52(4):530-534. DOI: 10.1002/uog.19000. View

12.

Vuong L, Dang V, Ho T, Huynh B, Ha D, Pham T . IVF Transfer of Fresh or Frozen Embryos in Women without Polycystic Ovaries. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(2):137-147. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703768. View

13.

Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo S . Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005; 11(3):300-8. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60837-1. View

14.

Blockeel C, Campbell A, Coticchio G, Esler J, Garcia-Velasco J, Santulli P . Should we still perform fresh embryo transfers in ART?. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(12):2319-2329. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez233. View

15.

Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, Sampaio M, Geber S . Cost-Effectiveness of the Freeze-All Policy. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2016; 19(3):125-30. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20150028. View

16.

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G, Dyer S, Racowsky C, de Mouzon J, Sokol R . The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017; 108(3):393-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005. View

17.

Papaleo E, Pagliardini L, Vanni V, Delprato D, Rubino P, Candiani M . A direct healthcare cost analysis of the cryopreserved versus fresh transfer policy at the blastocyst stage. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016; 34(1):19-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.09.008. View

18.

Roque M, Valle M, Kostolias A, Sampaio M, Geber S . Freeze-all cycle in reproductive medicine: current perspectives. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017; 21(1):49-53. PMC: 5365201. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170012. View

19.

Drakopoulos P, Blockeel C, Stoop D, Camus M, De Vos M, Tournaye H . Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(2):370-6. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. View

20.

Nagy Z, Shapiro D, Chang C . Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril. 2020; 113(2):241-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009. View