» Articles » PMID: 39877558

Focal Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Use of Artificial Intelligence to Define Tumour Volume and Predict Treatment Outcomes

Overview
Journal BJUI Compass
Date 2025 Jan 29
PMID 39877558
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate new software (Unfold AI) in the estimation of prostate tumour volume (TV) and prediction of focal therapy outcomes.

Subjects/patients And Methods: Subjects were 204 men with prostate cancer (PCa) of grade groups 2-4 (GG ≥ 2), who were enrolled in a trial of partial gland cryoablation (PGA) at UCLA from 2017 to 2022. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy (MRGB) was performed at diagnosis and at 6 and 18 months following PGA. Utilising Unfold AI (FDA-cleared 2022), which generates a 3D map of GG ≥ 2 PCa margins, we retrospectively estimated TV for each patient. TV was compared against conventional baseline variables as a correlate of a successful primary outcome-defined here as the absence of GG ≥ 2 on follow-up MRGB at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were MRGB at 18 months and failure-free survival, that is, lack of metastasis or salvage whole gland therapy. Receiver operating curves and multivariate analysis were used to determine significance.

Results: A successful primary outcome was observed in 77.7% of patients. Significant correlates of a successful ablation were percent pattern 4 and TV; areas under the curve (AUCs) were 0.60 and 0.73, respectively. GG was not a correlate of success (AUC = 0.51). A TV of 1.5 cc provided the optimal combination of sensitivity (55.8%) and specificity (85.7%) at 6 months. TV was also significantly associated with secondary outcomes. In multivariate analysis, TV was the variable most associated with 6- and 18-month biopsy success (adjusted odds ratios [aORs] were 6.1 and 4.2). Utilising TV ≤ 1.5 cc as a PGA criterion would have prevented 72% of failures at the cost of 42% of successes.

Conclusion: The AI-based software Unfold AI estimates TV, which is significantly associated with biopsy outcomes after focal cryoablation. The rate of treatment success is inversely related to TV.

Citing Articles

Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes.

Brisbane W, Priester A, Nguyen A, Topoozian M, Mota S, Delfin M BJUI Compass. 2025; 6(1):e456.

PMID: 39877558 PMC: 11771490. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.456.

References
1.
Brisbane W, Priester A, Nguyen A, Topoozian M, Mota S, Delfin M . Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Use of artificial intelligence to define tumour volume and predict treatment outcomes. BJUI Compass. 2025; 6(1):e456. PMC: 11771490. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.456. View

2.
Hegde J, Margolis D, Wang P, Reiter R, Huang J, Steinberg M . Establishing the distribution of satellite lesions in intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: implications for focused radiotherapy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; 20(2):241-248. PMC: 6946385. DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2016.75. View

3.
Tay K, Scheltema M, Ahmed H, Barret E, Coleman J, Dominguez-Escrig J . Patient selection for prostate focal therapy in the era of active surveillance: an International Delphi Consensus Project. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017; 20(3):294-299. DOI: 10.1038/pcan.2017.8. View

4.
Pooli A, Johnson D, Shirk J, Markovic D, Sadun T, Sisk Jr A . Predicting Pathological Tumor Size in Prostate Cancer Based on Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Preoperative Findings. J Urol. 2020; 205(2):444-451. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001389. View

5.
Kotamarti S, Polascik T . Focal cryotherapy for prostate cancer: a contemporary literature review. Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11(1):26. PMC: 9906190. DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-5033. View