Combining Radio-telemetry and Radar Measurements to Test Optimal Foraging in an Aerial Insectivore Bird

Overview

Journal Elife

Date 2025 Jan 27

PMID 39869495

Authors

Itai Bloch

David Troupin

Sivan Toledo

Ran Nathan

Nir Sapir

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Optimal foraging theory posits that foragers adjust their movements based on prey abundance to optimize food intake. While extensively studied in terrestrial and marine environments, aerial foraging has remained relatively unexplored due to technological limitations. This study, uniquely combining BirdScan-MR1 radar and the Advanced Tracking and Localization of Animals in Real-Life Systems biotelemetry system, investigates the foraging dynamics of Little Swifts () in response to insect movements over Israel's Hula Valley. Insect movement traffic rate (MoTR) substantially varied across days, strongly influencing swift movement. On days with high MoTR, swifts exhibited reduced flight distance, increased colony visit rate, and earlier arrivals at the breeding colony, reflecting a dynamic response to prey availability. However, no significant effects were observed in total foraging duration, flight speed, or daily route length. Notably, as insect abundance increased, inter-individual distances decreased. These findings suggest that Little Swifts optimize their foraging behavior in relation to aerial insect abundance, likely influencing reproductive success and population dynamics. The integration of radar technology and biotelemetry systems provides a unique perspective on the interactions between aerial insectivores and their prey, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of optimal foraging strategies in diverse environments.

Citing Articles

Combining radio-telemetry and radar measurements to test optimal foraging in an aerial insectivore bird.

Bloch I, Troupin D, Toledo S, Nathan R, Sapir N Elife. 2025; 13.

PMID: 39869495 PMC: 11771959. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.96573.

References

Hallmann C, Foppen R, van Turnhout C, de Kroon H, Jongejans E . Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature. 2014; 511(7509):341-3. DOI: 10.1038/nature13531. View

Cvikel N, Egert Berg K, Levin E, Hurme E, Borissov I, Boonman A . Bats aggregate to improve prey search but might be impaired when their density becomes too high. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(2):206-211. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.010. View

Roth 2nd T, Lima S . The predatory behavior of wintering Accipiter hawks: temporal patterns in activity of predators and prey. Oecologia. 2007; 152(1):169-78. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-006-0638-2. View

Liechti F, Witvliet W, Weber R, Bachler E . First evidence of a 200-day non-stop flight in a bird. Nat Commun. 2013; 4:2554. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3554. View

Gupte P, Beardsworth C, Spiegel O, Lourie E, Toledo S, Nathan R . A guide to pre-processing high-throughput animal tracking data. J Anim Ecol. 2021; 91(2):287-307. PMC: 9299236. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13610. View

Bloch I, Troupin D, Toledo S, Nathan R, Sapir N . Combining radio-telemetry and radar measurements to test optimal foraging in an aerial insectivore bird. Elife. 2025; 13. PMC: 11771959. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.96573. View

Hedrick T, Pichot C, de Margerie E . Gliding for a free lunch: biomechanics of foraging flight in common swifts (). J Exp Biol. 2018; 221(Pt 22). DOI: 10.1242/jeb.186270. View

Nathan R, Monk C, Arlinghaus R, Adam T, Alos J, Assaf M . Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement. Science. 2022; 375(6582):eabg1780. DOI: 10.1126/science.abg1780. View

Kunz T, Gauthreaux Jr S, Hristov N, Horn J, Jones G, Kalko E . Aeroecology: probing and modeling the aerosphere. Integr Comp Biol. 2011; 48(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icn037. View

10.

Charnov E . Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theor Popul Biol. 1976; 9(2):129-36. DOI: 10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x. View

11.

Amichai E, Kronfeld-Schor N . Artificial Light at Night Promotes Activity Throughout the Night in Nesting Common Swifts (Apus apus). Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):11052. PMC: 6667432. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-47544-3. View

12.

Arnon E, Cain S, Uzan A, Nathan R, Spiegel O, Toledo S . Robust Time-of-Arrival Location Estimation Algorithms for Wildlife Tracking. Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(23). PMC: 10708621. DOI: 10.3390/s23239460. View

13.

Nocera J, Blais J, Beresford D, Finity L, Grooms C, Kimpe L . Historical pesticide applications coincided with an altered diet of aerially foraging insectivorous chimney swifts. Proc Biol Sci. 2012; 279(1740):3114-20. PMC: 3385487. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.0445. View

14.

Bijleveld A, van Gils J, Jouta J, Piersma T . Benefits of foraging in small groups: An experimental study on public information use in red knots Calidris canutus. Behav Processes. 2014; 117:74-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.09.003. View

15.

Harding A, Piatt J, Schmutz J, Shultz M, Van Pelt T, Kettle A . Prey density and the behavioral flexibility of a marine predator: the common murre (Uria aalge). Ecology. 2007; 88(8):2024-33. DOI: 10.1890/06-1695.1. View

16.

Holder K, Polis G . Optimal and central-place foraging theory applied to a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex californicus. Oecologia. 2017; 72(3):440-448. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377577. View

17.

Haest B, Liechti F, Hawkes W, Chapman J, Akesson S, Shamoun-Baranes J . Continental-scale patterns in diel flight timing of high-altitude migratory insects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1904):20230116. PMC: 11070267. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0116. View

18.

Hallmann C, Sorg M, Jongejans E, Siepel H, Hofland N, Schwan H . More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0185809. PMC: 5646769. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185809. View

19.

Bowler D, Heldbjerg H, Fox A, de Jong M, Bohning-Gaese K . Long-term declines of European insectivorous bird populations and potential causes. Conserv Biol. 2019; 33(5):1120-1130. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13307. View

20.

Olsson O, Brown J, Helf K . A guide to central place effects in foraging. Theor Popul Biol. 2008; 74(1):22-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2008.04.005. View