Enhanced Ion Solvation and Conductivity in Lithium-Ion Electrolytes Via Tailored EMC-TMS Solvent Mixtures: A Molecular Dynamics Study

Overview

Journal ACS Omega

Publisher American Chemical Society

Date 2025 Jan 27

PMID 39866615

Authors

Jitti Kasemchainan

Siriporn Teeraburanapong

Manaswee Suttipong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The development of stable, high-performance electrolytes is essential to addressing the safety concerns and limited lifespan caused by the thermal and chemical instability of traditional organic carbonate-based electrolytes in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). This study examined the potential of mixed solvent systems, specifically ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) and tetramethylene sulfone (TMS), to modify ion solvation and improve ionic conductivity in LIB electrolytes. Through molecular dynamics simulations, we investigated the solvation structure and transport properties of lithium ions (Li) in these solvent environments. The inclusion of TMS altered the solvation structure, with TMS molecules preferentially coordinating with Li ions, displacing PF anions and reducing their electrostatic interference. Our results demonstrated a synergistic interaction between EMC and TMS, where an EMC/TMS ratio of 1:2 led to a significant improvement in ionic conductivity, reaching 0.91 mS/cm, with a corresponding Li transference number of 0.40. These findings provide key insights into the molecular-level interaction governing electrolyte behavior, offering guidance for the design of future solvent mixtures to improve the safety and efficiency of LIBs.

References

Borodin O . Polarizable force field development and molecular dynamics simulations of ionic liquids. J Phys Chem B. 2009; 113(33):11463-78. DOI: 10.1021/jp905220k. View

Unke O, Chmiela S, Sauceda H, Gastegger M, Poltavsky I, Schutt K . Machine Learning Force Fields. Chem Rev. 2021; 121(16):10142-10186. PMC: 8391964. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01111. View

Borodin O, Suo L, Gobet M, Ren X, Wang F, Faraone A . Liquid Structure with Nano-Heterogeneity Promotes Cationic Transport in Concentrated Electrolytes. ACS Nano. 2017; 11(10):10462-10471. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b05664. View

Wang A, Persa D, Helin S, Smith K, Raymond J, Monroe C . Compressibility of Lithium Hexafluorophosphate Solutions in Two Carbonate Solvents. J Chem Eng Data. 2023; 68(4):805-812. PMC: 10108564. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.2c00711. View

Fong K, Self J, Diederichsen K, Wood B, McCloskey B, Persson K . Ion Transport and the True Transference Number in Nonaqueous Polyelectrolyte Solutions for Lithium Ion Batteries. ACS Cent Sci. 2019; 5(7):1250-1260. PMC: 6661974. DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.9b00406. View

Shim Y . Computer simulation study of the solvation of lithium ions in ternary mixed carbonate electrolytes: free energetics, dynamics, and ion transport. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018; 20(45):28649-28657. DOI: 10.1039/c8cp05190a. View

Jorgensen W, Tirado-Rives J . The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. J Am Chem Soc. 2016; 110(6):1657-66. DOI: 10.1021/ja00214a001. View

Franco A, Rucci A, Brandell D, Frayret C, Gaberscek M, Jankowski P . Boosting Rechargeable Batteries R&D by Multiscale Modeling: Myth or Reality?. Chem Rev. 2019; 119(7):4569-4627. PMC: 6460402. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00239. View

Chang T, Dang L . Li solvation and kinetics of Li-BF/PF ion pairs in ethylene carbonate. A molecular dynamics study with classical rate theories. J Chem Phys. 2017; 147(16):161709. DOI: 10.1063/1.4991565. View

10.

Dhananjay , Mallik B . Cage Dynamics-Mediated High Ionic Transport in Li-O Batteries with a Hybrid Aprotic Electrolyte: LiTFSI, Sulfolane, and ,-Dimethylacetamide. J Phys Chem B. 2023; 127(13):2991-3000. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c07829. View

11.

Zaboli A, Raissi H, Hashemzadeh H, Farzad F . Toward efficient electrodes for a high-performance fast-charge Li-ion battery: molecular dynamics simulation and DFT calculations. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2023; 25(35):23937-23953. DOI: 10.1039/d2cp06020e. View

12.

Ong M, Verners O, Draeger E, van Duin A, Lordi V, Pask J . Lithium ion solvation and diffusion in bulk organic electrolytes from first-principles and classical reactive molecular dynamics. J Phys Chem B. 2014; 119(4):1535-45. DOI: 10.1021/jp508184f. View

13.

Bedrov D, Piquemal J, Borodin O, MacKerell Jr A, Roux B, Schroder C . Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Ionic Liquids and Electrolytes Using Polarizable Force Fields. Chem Rev. 2019; 119(13):7940-7995. PMC: 6620131. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00763. View

14.

Li M, Wang C, Chen Z, Xu K, Lu J . New Concepts in Electrolytes. Chem Rev. 2020; 120(14):6783-6819. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00531. View

15.

Diederichsen K, Terrell R, McCloskey B . Counterion Transport and Transference Number in Aqueous and Nonaqueous Short-Chain Polyelectrolyte Solutions. J Phys Chem B. 2019; 123(50):10858-10867. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b09517. View

16.

Leven I, Hao H, Tan S, Guan X, Penrod K, Akbarian D . Recent Advances for Improving the Accuracy, Transferability, and Efficiency of Reactive Force Fields. J Chem Theory Comput. 2021; 17(6):3237-3251. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00118. View

17.

Kang G, Zhong G, Ma J, Yin R, Cai K, Jia T . Weakly solvated EC-free linear alkyl carbonate electrolytes for Ni-rich cathode in rechargeable lithium battery. iScience. 2022; 25(12):105710. PMC: 9791360. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.105710. View

18.

Bhargava B, Balasubramanian S . Refined potential model for atomistic simulations of ionic liquid [bmim][PF6]. J Chem Phys. 2007; 127(11):114510. DOI: 10.1063/1.2772268. View

19.

Van der Ven A, Deng Z, Banerjee S, Ong S . Rechargeable Alkali-Ion Battery Materials: Theory and Computation. Chem Rev. 2020; 120(14):6977-7019. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00601. View

20.

Yao N, Chen X, Fu Z, Zhang Q . Applying Classical, , and Machine-Learning Molecular Dynamics Simulations to the Liquid Electrolyte for Rechargeable Batteries. Chem Rev. 2022; 122(12):10970-11021. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00904. View