» Articles » PMID: 39863776

Cachectic Biomarkers As Confounders Behind the Obesity Paradox in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Abstract

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for heart failure (HF) development but is associated with a lower incidence of mortality in HF patients. This obesity paradox may be confounded by unrecognized comorbidities, including cachexia.

Methods: A retrospective assessment was conducted using data from a prospectively recruiting multicenter registry, which included consecutive acute heart failure patients. A low, normal, and high body mass index (BMI) was defined as <20 kg/m, 20-25 kg/m, and ≥25 kg/m, respectively. Cachexia was defined as a combination of BMI < 20 kg/m and any biochemical abnormalities including albumin, hemoglobin, or C-reactive protein. Patients with either of the three biochemical abnormalities were categorized as those with cachectic biomarkers. Two-year all-cause, cardiac, and noncardiac mortality were evaluated.

Results: This study evaluated 3314 patients (mean BMI, 22 ± 4 kg/m [low BMI with cachexia, 828 (25%); low BMI without cachexia, 273 (8%); normal BMI, 1584 (48%); high BMI, 629 (19%)]). Overall, an increase of 1 point in BMI was associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-0.94; p < 0.001). Regardless of the mode of death, the low BMI with cachexia indicated the worst prognosis, while the low BMI without cachexia showed a similar prognosis to the normal BMI. Cachectic biomarkers, which were observed more frequently in the low BMI, predicted a higher incidence of 2-year all-cause mortality across the BMI categories (adjusted HR for the low BMI, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.30-2.77; p = 0.001; adjusted HR for the normal BMI, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.34-2.79; p < 0.001; adjusted HR for the high BMI, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.61-8.08; p = 0.002).

Conclusions: BMI could be only a surrogate marker. The cachectic biomarkers may reflect the underlying conditions and contribute to elucidating the obesity paradox.

References
1.
Savarese G, Lund L . Global Public Health Burden of Heart Failure. Card Fail Rev. 2017; 3(1):7-11. PMC: 5494150. DOI: 10.15420/cfr.2016:25:2. View

2.
Kenchaiah S, Evans J, Levy D, Wilson P, Benjamin E, Larson M . Obesity and the risk of heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(5):305-13. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa020245. View

3.
Horwich T, Fonarow G, Hamilton M, Maclellan W, Woo M, TILLISCH J . The relationship between obesity and mortality in patients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001; 38(3):789-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01448-6. View

4.
Shah R, Gayat E, Januzzi Jr J, Sato N, Cohen-Solal A, DiSomma S . Body mass index and mortality in acutely decompensated heart failure across the world: a global obesity paradox. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 63(8):778-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.072. View

5.
Horwich T, Fonarow G, Clark A . Obesity and the Obesity Paradox in Heart Failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2018; 61(2):151-156. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2018.05.005. View