» Articles » PMID: 39862223

High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: Frailty is defined as a state of minimal "physiologic reserve." The modified 5 factor frailty index (mFI-5) is a recently proposed metric for assessing frailty and has been previously studied as a predictor of morbidity and mortality. However, its utility in predicting postoperative patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and return to activities remains understudied.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing 1 or 2 level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion queried from a prospectively maintained multi-surgeon registry. Comorbidities including hypertension, congestive heart failure, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and functional status were utilized to calculate the mFI-5. Patients were separated into 3 cohorts, "non-frail," "moderately frail" or "severely frail" based on their mFI-5. Patient outcomes were compared between the cohorts.

Results: 392 patients were included of which 227 patients were non-frail, 134 were moderately frail, and 31 were severely frail. Frail patients had longer operative time ( = 0.002), greater estimated blood loss ( = 0.038). Despite similar preoperative PROMs, at a longer term follow up, frail patients also had worse PROM scores for ODI ( = 0.009), VAS-back ( = 0.028), and VAS-leg ( = 0.004). Frail patients had worse preoperative ( = 0.017) and postoperative ( < 0.001) SF-12 PCS. At 1-year, frail patients had lower rates of fusion ( = 0.002). Frail patients also demonstrated lower rates of returning to work ( = 0.018), returning to driving ( = 0.027), and discontinuation of narcotics ( = 0.004).

Conclusion: Frail patients as measured by the mFI-5 index demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes following 1 or 2 level MI-TLIF. Careful patient selection and preoperative optimization may be especially important in frail patients.

References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
Shahi P, Shinn D, Singh N, Subramanian T, Song J, Dalal S . ODI <25 Denotes Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spine Surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022; 48(3):196-202. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004479. View

3.
Subramanian T, Merrill R, Shahi P, Pathania S, Araghi K, Maayan O . Predictors of Subsidence and its Clinical Impact After Expandable Cage Insertion in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023; 48(23):1670-1678. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004619. View

4.
Safaee M, Dwaraka V, Lee J, Fury M, Mendez T, Smith R . Epigenetic age biomarkers and risk assessment in adult spinal deformity: a novel association of biological age with frailty and disability. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023; 40(3):312-323. DOI: 10.3171/2023.10.SPINE23435. View

5.
Sarmiento J, Shahi P, Melissaridou D, Fourman M, Araghi K, Qureshi S . Step-by-step guide to robotic-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). Ann Transl Med. 2023; 11(5):221. PMC: 10061490. DOI: 10.21037/atm-22-3273. View