» Articles » PMID: 37007570

Step-by-step Guide to Robotic-guided Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2023 Apr 3
PMID 37007570
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Robotics in spinal surgery offers a promising potential to refine and improve the minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) technique. Suitable surgeons for this technique include those who are already familiar with robotic-guided lumbar pedicle screw placement and want to advance their skillset by incorporating posterior-based interbody fusion. We provide a step-by-step guide for robotic-guided MI-TLIF. The procedure is divided into 7 practical and detailed techniques. The steps in sequential order include: (I) planning trajectories for pedicle screws and the tubular retractor; (II) robotic-guided pedicle screw placement; (III) placement of tubular retractor; (IV) unilateral facetectomy using the surgical microscope; (V) discectomy & disc preparation; (VI) interbody implant insertion; and (VII) percutaneous rod placement. We standardize surgeon training in robotic MI-TLIF by teaching our spine surgery fellows these 7 key technical steps highlighted in this guide. Current-generation robotics offers integrated navigation capability, K-wireless placement of pedicle screws through a rigid robotic arm, compatibility with tubular retractor systems to perform facetectomy, and allows for placement of interbody devices. We have found robotic-guided MI-TLIF to be a safe procedure that allows for accurate and reliable pedicle screw placement, less collateral damage to the soft tissues of the low back, and decreased radiation exposure.

Citing Articles

High Modified 5 Factor Frailty Index is Associated With Worse PROMs and Decreased Return to Activities After 1 or 2 Level MI-TLIF.

Subramanian T, Shahi P, Hirase T, Korsun M, Zhang J, Kim E Global Spine J. 2025; :21925682251314380.

PMID: 39862223 PMC: 11765304. DOI: 10.1177/21925682251314380.


Robotic-Assisted Decompression, Decortication, and Instrumentation for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Altorfer F, Avrumova F, Lebl D JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2024; 14(4).

PMID: 39650794 PMC: 11617349. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00080.


Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Decompression Alone Versus Fusion for Predominant Back Pain.

Shahi P, Subramanian T, Maayan O, Singh N, Araghi K, Singh S HSS J. 2024; 21(1):42-48.

PMID: 39564421 PMC: 11572594. DOI: 10.1177/15563316231223503.


Impact of age on comparative outcomes of decompression alone versus fusion for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Shahi P, Singh S, Morse K, Maayan O, Subramanian T, Araghi K Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(10):3749-3759.

PMID: 38907067 PMC: 11780706. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08336-0.


Effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wang X, Liu H, Ma Y, Zhu Q, Zhu Y J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):37.

PMID: 38231423 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01768-8.


References
1.
Keric N, Doenitz C, Haj A, Rachwal-Czyzewicz I, Renovanz M, Wesp D . Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 42(5):E11. DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS16552. View

2.
Kantelhardt S, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rohde V . Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(6):860-8. PMC: 3099153. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2. View

3.
Urakov T, Chang K, Burks S, Wang M . Initial academic experience and learning curve with robotic spine instrumentation. Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 42(5):E4. DOI: 10.3171/2017.2.FOCUS175. View

4.
Bagheri S, Alimohammadi E, Zamani Froushani A, Abdi A . Adjacent segment disease after posterior lumbar instrumentation surgery for degenerative disease: Incidence and risk factors. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019; 27(2):2309499019842378. DOI: 10.1177/2309499019842378. View

5.
Shinn D, Mok J, Vaishnav A, Louie P, Sivaganesan A, Shahi P . Recovery Kinetics After Commonly Performed Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Procedures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022; 47(21):1489-1496. PMC: 11905977. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004399. View