» Articles » PMID: 39857526

Mobilising Cross-Sectoral Collaboration in Creating Age-Friendly Cities: Case Studies from Akita and Manchester

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 25
PMID 39857526
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Developing Age-Friendly Cities and Communities (AFCCs) is an increasingly popular policy response to supporting ageing populations. AFCC programmes rely on cross-sectoral collaboration, involving partnerships among diverse stakeholders working across sectors to address shared goals. However, there remains a limited understanding of what mechanisms and strategies drive collaboration among diverse actors within age-friendly cities. To address this gap, this empirical paper draws on examples from a comparative case study across Akita (Japan) and Manchester (UK), two cities with distinct demographic profiles but both with a longstanding commitment to the age-friendly approach. Case studies were created through a range of data collection methods, namely, a review of secondary data sources, semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders, and fieldwork in each city. Key insights from the case studies relating to the mobilisation of cross-sectoral collaboration were categorised into three themes: leadership and influencing, co-production, and place-based working. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive; collaboration building through co-production and place-based working is essential to deliver age-friendly programmes, but these mechanisms rely on leadership and influence. Therefore, it is recommended that all three mechanisms be used to effectively mobilise cross-sectoral collaborations to collectively create AFCC and support healthy ageing.

References
1.
Greenfield E . Getting Started: An Empirically Derived Logic Model for Age-Friendly Community Initiatives in the Early Planning Phase. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2018; 61(3):295-312. DOI: 10.1080/01634372.2018.1432736. View

2.
Yarker S, Buffel T . Involving Socially Excluded Groups in Age-Friendly Programs: The Role of a Spatial Lens and Co-Production Approaches. J Aging Soc Policy. 2022; 34(2):254-274. DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2022.2049571. View

3.
Fulmer T, Patel P, Levy N, Mate K, Berman A, Pelton L . Moving Toward a Global Age-Friendly Ecosystem. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020; 68(9):1936-1940. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.16675. View

4.
Buffel T, McGarry P, Phillipson C, De Donder L, Dury S, De Witte N . Developing age-friendly cities: case studies from Brussels and Manchester and implications for policy and practice. J Aging Soc Policy. 2013; 26(1-2):52-72. DOI: 10.1080/08959420.2014.855043. View

5.
Remillard-Boilard S, Buffel T, Phillipson C . Developing Age-Friendly Cities and Communities: Eleven Case Studies from around the World. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 18(1). PMC: 7795502. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010133. View