» Articles » PMID: 24266604

Developing Age-friendly Cities: Case Studies from Brussels and Manchester and Implications for Policy and Practice

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2013 Nov 26
PMID 24266604
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Developing environments responsive to the aspirations of older people has become a major concern for social and public policy. Policies and programs directed at achieving "age-friendly" communities are considered to require a wide range of interventions, including actions at the level of the social and physical environment. This article compares the age-friendly approaches of two European cities, Brussels and Manchester, with a particular focus on policies and initiatives that promote active aging in an urban context. The article examines, first, the demographic, social, and multicultural contexts of Brussels and Manchester; second, the way in which both cities became members of the World Health Organization Global Network of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities; third, similarities and differences in the age-friendly approaches and actions adopted by both cities; and fourth, opportunities and barriers to the implementation of age-friendly policies. The article concludes by discussing the key elements and resources needed to develop age-friendly cities.

Citing Articles

Mobilising Cross-Sectoral Collaboration in Creating Age-Friendly Cities: Case Studies from Akita and Manchester.

Doran P, Yarker S, Buffel T, Satake H, Watanabe F, Kimoto M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39857526 PMC: 11764577. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010073.


Construction and improvement strategies of an age-friendly evaluation system for public spaces in affordable housing communities: a case study of Shenzhen.

Han J, Ma H, Wang M, Li J Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1399852.

PMID: 39091526 PMC: 11293305. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1399852.


Caring neighbourhoods in Belgium: lessons learned on the development, implementation and evaluation of 35 caring neighbourhood projects.

De Donder L, Stegen H, Hoens S Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2024; 18:26323524241246533.

PMID: 38682084 PMC: 11055489. DOI: 10.1177/26323524241246533.


Age Friendly Characteristics and Sense of Community of an Italian City: The Case of Macerata.

Monachesi P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(10).

PMID: 37239573 PMC: 10218205. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20105847.


Universities as Intermediary Organizations: Catalyzing the Construction of an Age-Friendly City in Hong Kong.

Chui C, Lu S, Chan O, Cheung J, Guo Y, Liu Y Innov Aging. 2023; 7(3):igad016.

PMID: 37038553 PMC: 10082544. DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igad016.