» Articles » PMID: 39857496

Measuring Wellness Through Indigenous Partnerships: A Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 25
PMID 39857496
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Indigenous wellness has been defined in varying contexts by diverse Indigenous Peoples. The existing indicators used to measure wellness are often defined from a Western perspective. Despite the rich conceptualizations of Indigenous wellness, there exists a notable gap in how it can be measured in contemporary contexts through an Indigenous lens. A scoping review methodology with the aim of identifying measures of wellness developed through Indigenous partnerships was carried out. We completed a systematic search in the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Psych Info Academic Search Complete, SocIndex, and the Native Health Database. We then carried out a two-stage article screening process to identify eighteen relevant papers. Content analysis was then used to identify (1) the major categories for the partnership contexts utilized in the process for measuring Indigenous wellness and (2) the kinds of measures developed. Five main categories were characterized, including the following: (1) building relationships that uphold Indigenous worldviews is important, (2) a call for co-development protocols that weave multiple worldviews, (3) the need to increase awareness of the limitations in measuring Indigenous wellness, (4) community-specific context is important, and (5) a call for strengths-based indicators. Governments, organizations, and research partners are called upon to support the co-development of meaningful engagement protocols that privilege and reflect Indigenous voices and perspectives when measuring Indigenous wellness.

Citing Articles

Measuring Wellness Through Indigenous Partnerships: A Scoping Review.

Mad Plume L, Carroll D, Nadeau M, Redvers N Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 22(1).

PMID: 39857496 PMC: 11764526. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph22010043.

References
1.
Okpalauwaekwe U, Ballantyne C, Tunison S, Ramsden V . Enhancing health and wellness by, for and with Indigenous youth in Canada: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2022; 22(1):1630. PMC: 9422134. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14047-2. View

2.
Wright M, Getta A, Green A, Kickett U, Kickett A, McNamara A . Co-Designing Health Service Evaluation Tools That Foreground First Nation Worldviews for Better Mental Health and Wellbeing Outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16). PMC: 8394671. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168555. View

3.
Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Ahmed S, Anise A, Azzahir A, Baker K, Cupito A . Assessing Meaningful Community Engagement: A Conceptual Model to Advance Health Equity through Transformed Systems for Health: Organizing Committee for Assessing Meaningful Community Engagement in Health & Health Care Programs & Policies. NAM Perspect. 2022; 2022. PMC: 9303007. DOI: 10.31478/202202c. View

4.
Howard K, Garvey G, Anderson K, Dickson M, Viney R, Ratcliffe J . Development of the What Matters 2 Adults (WM2A) wellbeing measure for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults. Soc Sci Med. 2024; 347:116694. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116694. View

5.
McKivett A, Paul D . Recreating the future-Indigenous research paradigms in health professional education research. Med Educ. 2023; 58(1):149-156. DOI: 10.1111/medu.15154. View