» Articles » PMID: 39851952

Rebiopsy Enhances Survival with Afatinib Vs. Osimertinib in EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Taiwan

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 24
PMID 39851952
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Afatinib and Osimertinib are first-line treatments for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their comparative efficacies and the patient groups that benefit the most remain unclear. This multicenter retrospective study evaluated the efficacy of first-line Afatinib and Osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases at diagnosis.

Methods: The primary endpoints were time on treatment (ToT) and overall survival (OS). Survival analyses were performed for three groups: Afatinib followed by Osimertinib, Afatinib followed by other therapies, and Osimertinib (alone or followed by other therapies). Rebiopsy practices, including T790M mutation detection, were also analyzed in patients with disease progression on Afatinib.

Results: Among 97 Afatinib-treated and 60 Osimertinib-treated patients, Osimertinib showed a significantly longer ToT (23.3 vs. 16.5 months; = 0.007). Median OS was numerically higher for Afatinib with sequential Osimertinib (40.5 vs. 34.6 months for Osimertinib; = 0.473). Osimertinib demonstrated advantages, with fewer brain metastases upon progression and fewer adverse effects. In the Afatinib group, 64% of patients with disease progression underwent rebiopsy, with 39% testing positive for T790M mutation and subsequently receiving Osimertinib. Rebiopsy was most frequently performed on the lung parenchyma using non-surgical methods.

Conclusions: In this real-world study, Osimertinib achieved a significantly longer ToT compared to Afatinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR 19del and no brain metastases. The sequential use of Afatinib followed by Osimertinib showed a trend toward improved OS, highlighting the importance of rebiopsy for identifying T790M mutations to guide subsequent therapy.

References
1.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

2.
Chen P, Wang C, Hsu C, Chen C . Association of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment With Progression-Free Survival Among Taiwanese Patients With Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma and EGFR Mutation. Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12:720687. PMC: 8382571. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.720687. View

3.
Cross D, Ashton S, Ghiorghiu S, Eberlein C, Nebhan C, Spitzler P . AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014; 4(9):1046-61. PMC: 4315625. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0337. View

4.
Ballard P, Yates J, Yang Z, Kim D, Yang J, Cantarini M . Preclinical Comparison of Osimertinib with Other EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Brain Metastases Models, and Early Evidence of Clinical Brain Metastases Activity. Clin Cancer Res. 2016; 22(20):5130-5140. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0399. View

5.
Shi Y, Au J, Thongprasert S, Srinivasan S, Tsai C, Khoa M . A prospective, molecular epidemiology study of EGFR mutations in Asian patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer of adenocarcinoma histology (PIONEER). J Thorac Oncol. 2014; 9(2):154-62. PMC: 4132036. DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000033. View