» Articles » PMID: 30153097

CNS Response to Osimertinib Versus Standard Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Untreated EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Abstract

Purpose We report CNS efficacy of osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer from the phase III FLAURA study. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 556) were randomly assigned to osimertinib or standard EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib); brain scans were not mandated unless clinically indicated. Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included. In patients with symptomatic CNS metastases, neurologic status was required to be stable for ≥ 2 weeks after completion of definitive therapy and corticosteroids. A preplanned subgroup analysis with CNS progression-free survival as primary objective was conducted in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiologic review. The CNS evaluable-for-response set included patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Results Of 200 patients with available brain scans at baseline, 128 (osimertinib, n = 61; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 67) had measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, including 41 patients (osimertinib, n = 22; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 19) with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Median CNS progression-free survival in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions was not reached with osimertinib (95% CI, 16.5 months to not calculable) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 8.3 months to not calculable) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .014 [nominally statistically significant]). CNS objective response rates were 91% and 68% in patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 34.9; P = .066) and 66% and 43% in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2; P = .011) treated with osimertinib and standard EGFR-TKIs, respectively. Probability of experiencing a CNS progression event was consistently lower with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion Osimertinib has CNS efficacy in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. These results suggest a reduced risk of CNS progression with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs.

Citing Articles

Advancing leptomeningeal metastases treatment in -mutated non-small cell lung cancer: lessons from the BLOSSOM trial.

Bortolot M, Huijs J, Brandsma D, Compter A, van Geel R, Hendriks L Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025; 14(1):7-13.

PMID: 39958217 PMC: 11826264. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-1006.


Optimizing Osimertinib for NSCLC: Targeting Resistance and Exploring Combination Therapeutics.

Liao Y, Tsai C, Huang H Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941826 PMC: 11815769. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030459.


Brain metastases from lung cancer: recent advances and novel therapeutic opportunities.

Layng S, Betsock A, Mansouri A, Komiya T, Miccio J, Mahase S Discov Oncol. 2025; 16(1):157.

PMID: 39934444 PMC: 11813848. DOI: 10.1007/s12672-025-01873-0.


Short-term survivors with brain metastases have modest benefits from focal and systemic therapies and remain frequent despite improving treatment landscape.

Czogalla M, Stohr J, Gleim N, Papsdorf K, Klagges S, Hambsch P Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2025; 51:100919.

PMID: 39877301 PMC: 11772985. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100919.


Rebiopsy Enhances Survival with Afatinib vs. Osimertinib in EGFR Exon 19 Deletion Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Multicenter Study in Taiwan.

Kuo J, Chang C, Chang S, Wei Y, Chen C Curr Oncol. 2025; 32(1).

PMID: 39851952 PMC: 11763488. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol32010036.