6.
Gluge J, Scheringer M, Cousins I, DeWitt J, Goldenman G, Herzke D
. An overview of the uses of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2020; 22(12):2345-2373.
PMC: 7784712.
DOI: 10.1039/d0em00291g.
View
7.
Yang L, Yang W, Lv S, Zhu T, Sharif H, Yang C
. Is HFPO-DA (GenX) a suitable substitute for PFOA? A comprehensive degradation comparison of PFOA and GenX via electrooxidation. Environ Res. 2021; 204(Pt A):111995.
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111995.
View
8.
Gluge J, London R, Cousins I, DeWitt J, Goldenman G, Herzke D
. Information Requirements under the Essential-Use Concept: PFAS Case Studies. Environ Sci Technol. 2021; 56(10):6232-6242.
PMC: 8980108.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03732.
View
9.
Cousins I, Goldenman G, Herzke D, Lohmann R, Miller M, Ng C
. The concept of essential use for determining when uses of PFASs can be phased out. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2019; 21(11):1803-1815.
PMC: 6992415.
DOI: 10.1039/c9em00163h.
View
10.
Cousins I, DeWitt J, Gluge J, Goldenman G, Herzke D, Lohmann R
. The high persistence of PFAS is sufficient for their management as a chemical class. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2020; 22(12):2307-2312.
PMC: 7784706.
DOI: 10.1039/d0em00355g.
View
11.
van Dijk J, Figuiere R, Dekker S, van Wezel A, Cousins I
. Managing PMT/vPvM substances in consumer products through the concepts of essential-use and functional substitution: a case-study for cosmetics. Environ Sci Process Impacts. 2023; 25(6):1067-1081.
DOI: 10.1039/d3em00025g.
View
12.
Gebreab K, Eeza M, Bai T, Zuberi Z, Matysik J, OShea K
. Comparative toxicometabolomics of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and next-generation perfluoroalkyl substances. Environ Pollut. 2020; 265(Pt A):114928.
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114928.
View
13.
Buck R, Franklin J, Berger U, Conder J, Cousins I, de Voogt P
. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances in the environment: terminology, classification, and origins. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2011; 7(4):513-41.
PMC: 3214619.
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.258.
View
14.
Guelfo J, Korzeniowski S, Mills M, Anderson J, Anderson R, Arblaster J
. Environmental Sources, Chemistry, Fate, and Transport of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: State of the Science, Key Knowledge Gaps, and Recommendations Presented at the August 2019 SETAC Focus Topic Meeting. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021; 40(12):3234-3260.
PMC: 8745034.
DOI: 10.1002/etc.5182.
View
15.
Bechu A, Roy M, Jacobs M, Tickner J
. Alternatives assessment: An analysis on progress and future needs for research and practice. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2023; 20(5):1337-1354.
DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4882.
View
16.
Holmquist H, Schellenberger S, Van der Veen I, Peters G, Leonards P, Cousins I
. Properties, performance and associated hazards of state-of-the-art durable water repellent (DWR) chemistry for textile finishing. Environ Int. 2016; 91:251-64.
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.035.
View
17.
Ankley G, Cureton P, Hoke R, Houde M, Kumar A, Kurias J
. Assessing the Ecological Risks of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances: Current State-of-the Science and a Proposed Path Forward. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2020; 40(3):564-605.
PMC: 7984443.
DOI: 10.1002/etc.4869.
View
18.
Jacobs M, Malloy T, Tickner J, Edwards S
. Alternatives Assessment Frameworks: Research Needs for the Informed Substitution of Hazardous Chemicals. Environ Health Perspect. 2015; 124(3):265-80.
PMC: 4786344.
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1409581.
View
19.
Ateia M, Scheringer M
. From "forever chemicals" to fluorine-free alternatives. Science. 2024; 385(6706):256-258.
PMC: 11313905.
DOI: 10.1126/science.ado5019.
View