The Development and Content of Movement Quality Assessments in Athletic Populations: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis

Overview

Journal Sports Med Open

Date 2025 Jan 23

PMID 39847263

Authors

Gyan A Wijekulasuriya

Carl T Woods

Aden Kittel

Paul Larkin

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Despite their prominence in the sport and human movement sciences, to date, there is no systematic insight about the development and content of movement quality assessments in athletic populations. This is an important gap to address, as it could yield both practical and scientific implications related to the continued screening of movement quality in athletic contexts. Hence, this study aimed to systematically review the (i) developmental approach, (ii) movements included, (iii) scoring system utilised, and (iv) the reliability of movement competency assessments used in athletic populations.

Methods: Electronic databases (SPORTDiscus, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus) were searched for relevant articles up to 12 May 2023. Studies were included if they reported data about the developmental approach, movements included, scoring system utilised and reliability of assessment in an athletic population. A modified Downs and Black checklist was used to measure study quality.

Results: From a total of 131 identified studies: (i) 26 (20%) described the developmental approach of an assessment; (ii) 113 (86%) included descriptions of the movements included; (iii) 106 (81%) included a description of scoring system and criteria; and (iv) 77 (59%) studies included reliability statistics. There were 36 assessments identified within these studies, comprising 59 movements in total. Each assessment scored movement quality through a Likert or binary classification system.

Conclusion: First, the results demonstrate that choosing an appropriate movement quality assessment in an athletic population may be a complex process for practitioners as the development approach, movements included and scoring criteria vary substantially between assessments. Second, academics could use these results to help design new assessments for novel applications that meet rigour and reliability requirements. Third, these results have the potential to foster guidelines of use for the reliable assessment of movement quality in athletic populations.

References

Hulteen R, Terlizzi B, Abrams T, Sacko R, De Meester A, Pesce C . Reinvest to Assess: Advancing Approaches to Motor Competence Measurement Across the Lifespan. Sports Med. 2022; 53(1):33-50. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-022-01750-8. View

Atalay E, Tarakci D, Algun C . Are the functional movement analysis scores of handball players related to athletic parameters?. J Exerc Rehabil. 2019; 14(6):954-959. PMC: 6323323. DOI: 10.12965/jer.1836372.186. View

Kozlenia D, Domaradzki J . The Impact of Physical Performance on Functional Movement Screen Scores and Asymmetries in Female University Physical Education Students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(16). PMC: 8394023. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18168872. View

Fortenbaugh D, Fleisig G, Andrews J . Baseball pitching biomechanics in relation to injury risk and performance. Sports Health. 2012; 1(4):314-20. PMC: 3445126. DOI: 10.1177/1941738109338546. View

Rogers D, McKeown I, Parfitt G, Burgess D, Eston R . Inter- and Intra-rater Reliability of the Athletic Ability Assessment in Subelite Australian Rules Football Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2017; 33(1):125-138. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002175. View

Schwiertz G, Brueckner D, Schedler S, Kiss R, Muehlbauer T . RELIABILITY AND MINIMAL DETECTABLE CHANGE OF THE UPPER QUARTER Y-BALANCE TEST IN HEALTHY ADOLESCENTS AGED 12 TO 17 YEARS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019; 14(6):927-934. PMC: 6878871. View

Silva B, Clemente F, Camoes M, Bezerra P . Functional Movement Screen Scores and Physical Performance among Youth Elite Soccer Players. Sports (Basel). 2018; 5(1). PMC: 5969015. DOI: 10.3390/sports5010016. View

Whiteside D, Deneweth J, Pohorence M, Sandoval B, Russell J, McLean S . Grading the Functional Movement Screen: A Comparison of Manual (Real-Time) and Objective Methods. J Strength Cond Res. 2014; 30(4):924-33. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000654. View

Barnett L, Lai S, Veldman S, Hardy L, Cliff D, Morgan P . Correlates of Gross Motor Competence in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Med. 2016; 46(11):1663-1688. PMC: 5055571. DOI: 10.1007/s40279-016-0495-z. View

10.

Bennell K, Talbot R, Wajswelner H, Techovanich W, Kelly D, Hall A . Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of a weight-bearing lunge measure of ankle dorsiflexion. Aust J Physiother. 2001; 44(3):175-180. DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60377-9. View

11.

Rowan C, Kuropkat C, Gumieniak R, Gledhill N, Jamnik V . Integration of the functional movement screen into the National Hockey League Combine. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(5):1163-71. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000757. View

12.

Davis J, Orr R, Knapik J, Harris D . Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) Scores and Demographics of US Army Pre-Ranger Candidates. Mil Med. 2019; 185(5-6):e788-e794. DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usz373. View

13.

Zhang J, Lin J, Wei H, Liu H . Relationships between Functional Movement Quality and Sprint and Jump Performance in Female Youth Soccer Athletes of Team China. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(9). PMC: 9497205. DOI: 10.3390/children9091312. View

14.

Silva Y, Novaes W, Dos Passos M, Nascimento V, Cavalcante B, Pitangui A . Reliability of the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test in young adults. Phys Ther Sport. 2019; 38:17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.04.004. View

15.

Aman M, Forssblad M, Larsen K . Incidence and body location of reported acute sport injuries in seven sports using a national insurance database. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017; 28(3):1147-1158. DOI: 10.1111/sms.12956. View

16.

Glass S, Schmitz R, Rhea C, Ross S . LOAD-ENHANCED MOVEMENT QUALITY SCREENING AND TACTICAL ATHLETICISM: AN EXTENSION OF EVIDENCE. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017; 12(3):408-416. PMC: 5455190. View

17.

Campa F, Semprini G, Judice P, Messina G, Toselli S . Anthropometry, Physical and Movement Features, and Repeated-sprint Ability in Soccer Players. Int J Sports Med. 2018; 40(2):100-109. DOI: 10.1055/a-0781-2473. View

18.

Lee S, Kim H, Kim J . The Functional Movement Screen total score and physical performance in elite male collegiate soccer players. J Exerc Rehabil. 2019; 15(5):657-662. PMC: 6834696. DOI: 10.12965/jer.1938422.211. View

19.

Smith C, Chimera N, Wright N, Warren M . Interrater and intrarater reliability of the functional movement screen. J Strength Cond Res. 2012; 27(4):982-7. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182606df2. View

20.

Gonzalo-Skok O, Serna J, Rhea M, Marin P . RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT TESTS AND PERFORMANCE TESTS IN YOUNG ELITE MALE BASKETBALL PLAYERS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015; 10(5):628-38. PMC: 4595916. View