» Articles » PMID: 30656154

Are the Functional Movement Analysis Scores of Handball Players Related to Athletic Parameters?

Overview
Journal J Exerc Rehabil
Date 2019 Jan 19
PMID 30656154
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Handball is a popular sport in many countries. There is lack of knowledge about handball athlete's functional movement capacity. The aim of this study is to investigate the Functional Movement Screen (FMS) scores, to evaluate the injury risks of handball athletes and to determine its relationship with athletic performance. A total of 51 professional handball players were included in this study. The sport-specific features and demographic data were recorded. The functional movement analysis was performed, agility and balance and force were evaluated. 37 were females and 14 were males. The mean age 21.00±4.50 years (range, 16-35 years). The mean FMS scores of handball athletes were 12.86±2.57. In addition, asymmetries were found between the left and right side FMS scores. There was a statistically significant poor correlation between the FMS and agility (=0.292, =0.038) and balance (right: =0.224, =0.024; left: =0.228, =0.022). Handball is a risky sport for injuries; therefore, athletes, coaches, and medical staff should recognize about the removal of functional deficiency before performance training. The FMS is a useful and cost-effective approach to identify these deficiencies. It is necessary not only to prevent injuries, but also to improve performance. These tests must be done before every season and, then, corrective, medical, or conservative approaches may be applied to athletes before performance training. (Clinical Trial ID: NCT03468569).

Citing Articles

The Development and Content of Movement Quality Assessments in Athletic Populations: A Systematic Review and Multilevel Meta-Analysis.

Wijekulasuriya G, Woods C, Kittel A, Larkin P Sports Med Open. 2025; 11(1):7.

PMID: 39847263 PMC: 11757847. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-025-00813-0.


Clustered Associations between Musculoskeletal Fitness Tests and Functional Movement Screen in Physically Active Men.

Domaradzki J, Kozlenia D Biomed Res Int. 2023; 2023:5942329.

PMID: 36814800 PMC: 9940965. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5942329.


Analysis of Biomechanical Parameters of Martial Arts Routine Athletes' Jumping Difficulty Based on Image Recognition.

Qiao M, Dong S Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022; 2022:6341852.

PMID: 35720879 PMC: 9200538. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6341852.


The Functional Movement Screen total score and physical performance in elite male collegiate soccer players.

Lee S, Kim H, Kim J J Exerc Rehabil. 2019; 15(5):657-662.

PMID: 31723553 PMC: 6834696. DOI: 10.12965/jer.1938422.211.

References
1.
Carlock J, Smith S, Hartman M, Morris R, Ciroslan D, Pierce K . The relationship between vertical jump power estimates and weightlifting ability: a field-test approach. J Strength Cond Res. 2004; 18(3):534-9. DOI: 10.1519/R-13213.1. View

2.
Amiri-Khorasani M, Sahebozamani M, Tabrizi K, Yusof A . Acute effect of different stretching methods on Illinois agility test in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010; 24(10):2698-704. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181bf049c. View

3.
Plisky P, Gorman P, Butler R, Kiesel K, Underwood F, Elkins B . The reliability of an instrumented device for measuring components of the star excursion balance test. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 4(2):92-9. PMC: 2953327. View

4.
Kiesel K, Plisky P, Voight M . Can Serious Injury in Professional Football be Predicted by a Preseason Functional Movement Screen?. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 2(3):147-58. PMC: 2953296. View

5.
Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B . Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther. 2011; 1(2):62-72. PMC: 2953313. View