» Articles » PMID: 39845227

Foreign Body Entrapment on the Bearing Surface in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Report of Three Cases

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2025 Jan 23
PMID 39845227
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a highly effective surgical intervention for end-stage hip joint disorders. While common complications such as infection, dislocation, and prosthetic loosening are well-documented, rarer complications remain underreported. One such complication is foreign body interposition on the bearing surface, which can compromise joint mechanics and adversely affect outcomes. This study presents three cases of foreign body interposition involving soft tissue, bone fragments, and cement debris, observed postoperatively in patients undergoing THA. In the first case, a 79-year-old woman presented with soft tissue interposition, which resolved spontaneously through joint motion without surgical intervention. The second case involved a 71-year-old woman with a bone fragment interposed between the femoral head and liner, necessitating reoperation for removal. The third case, a 32-year-old man, required immediate reoperation to remove a 1 cm cement fragment causing a gap on the bearing surface. In all cases, postoperative outcomes were favorable, with patients resuming independent ambulation and reporting no persistent symptoms. These cases underscore the potential for foreign body interposition to occur during or after THA due to residual debris or displaced tissues. This rare complication has an estimated incidence of 0.2% based on 1,340 procedures at three affiliated hospitals over two years. Key preventive strategies include meticulous removal of debris before reduction, thorough irrigation, and intraoperative imaging to confirm proper alignment. For management, immediate mobilization may resolve soft tissue interpositions, but solid foreign bodies typically require reoperation to prevent long-term damage to the bearing surfaces and subsequent complications, such as osteolysis, implant loosening, or catastrophic ceramic fracture. This report emphasizes the importance of heightened awareness, careful intraoperative techniques, and prompt postoperative imaging to identify and address this preventable complication. By sharing these insights, we aim to enhance perioperative safety and improve long-term outcomes for patients undergoing THA.

References
1.
Moerenhout K, Derome P, Laflamme G, Leduc S, Gaspard H, Benoit B . Direct anterior versus posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: a multicentre, prospective, randomized clinical trial. Can J Surg. 2020; 63(5):E412-E417. PMC: 7608717. View

2.
Anderson C, Jang S, Brilliant Z, Mayman D, Vigdorchik J, Jerabek S . Complication Rate After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Posterior Approach and Enabling Technology: A Consecutive Series of 2,888 Hips. J Arthroplasty. 2023; 38(7S):S119-S123.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.04.029. View

3.
Koo K, Ha Y, Jung W, Kim S, Yoo J, Kim H . Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90(2):329-36. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.F.01489. View

4.
Luchetti W, Copley L, Vresilovic E, Black J, STEINBERG M . Drain entrapment and titanium to ceramic head deposition: two unique complications following closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13(6):713-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)80018-1. View

5.
Mimnaugh K, Yao J, Laurent M, Crowninshield R, Mason J, Blanchard C . The effect of entrapped bone particles on the surface morphology and wear of polyethylene. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(2):303-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.10.027. View