» Articles » PMID: 39843425

Motif Distribution and DNA Methylation Underlie Distinct Cdx2 Binding During Development and Homeostasis

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Date 2025 Jan 22
PMID 39843425
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcription factors guide tissue development by binding to developmental stage-specific targets and establishing an appropriate enhancer landscape. In turn, DNA and chromatin modifications direct the genomic binding of transcription factors. However, how transcription factors navigate chromatin features to selectively bind a small subset of all the possible genomic target loci remains poorly understood. Here we show that Cdx2-a lineage defining transcription factor that binds distinct targets in developing versus adult intestinal epithelial cells-has a preferential affinity for a non-canonical CpG-containing motif in vivo. A higher frequency of this motif at embryonic Cdx2 targets and methylated state of the CpG during development enables selective Cdx2 binding and activation of developmental enhancers and genes. In adult cells, demethylation at these enhancers prevents ectopic Cdx2 binding, instead directing Cdx2 to its canonical motif without a CpG. This shift in Cdx2 binding facilitates Ctcf and Hnf4 recruitment, establishing super-enhancers during development and homeostatic enhancers in adult cells, respectively. Induced DNA methylation in adult mouse epithelium or cultured cells recruits Cdx2 to developmental targets, promoting corecruitment of partner transcription factors. Thus, Cdx2's differential CpG motif preferences enable it to navigate distinct DNA methylation profiles, activating genes specific to appropriate developmental stages.

References
1.
Zhang H, Emerson D, Gilgenast T, Titus K, Lan Y, Huang P . Chromatin structure dynamics during the mitosis-to-G1 phase transition. Nature. 2019; 576(7785):158-162. PMC: 6895436. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-1778-y. View

2.
Slattery M, Zhou T, Yang L, Dantas Machado A, Gordan R, Rohs R . Absence of a simple code: how transcription factors read the genome. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014; 39(9):381-99. PMC: 4149858. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2014.07.002. View

3.
Bailey T, Johnson J, Grant C, Noble W . The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015; 43(W1):W39-49. PMC: 4489269. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkv416. View

4.
Kazakevych J, Sayols S, Messner B, Krienke C, Soshnikova N . Dynamic changes in chromatin states during specification and differentiation of adult intestinal stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(10):5770-5784. PMC: 5449638. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx167. View

5.
Oomen M, Hansen A, Liu Y, Darzacq X, Dekker J . CTCF sites display cell cycle-dependent dynamics in factor binding and nucleosome positioning. Genome Res. 2019; 29(2):236-249. PMC: 6360813. DOI: 10.1101/gr.241547.118. View