» Articles » PMID: 39841629

Life Satisfaction Around the World: Measurement Invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) Across 65 Nations, 40 Languages, Gender Identities, and Age Groups

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2025 Jan 22
PMID 39841629
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) is a widely used self-report measure of subjective well-being, but studies of its measurement invariance across a large number of nations remain limited. Here, we utilised the Body Image in Nature (BINS) dataset-with data collected between 2020 and 2022 -to assess measurement invariance of the SWLS across 65 nations, 40 languages, gender identities, and age groups (N = 56,968). All participants completed the SWLS under largely uniform conditions. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis indicated that configural and metric invariance was upheld across all nations, languages, gender identities, and age groups, suggesting that the unidimensional SWLS model has universal applicability. Full scalar invariance was achieved across gender identities and age groups. Based on alignment optimisation methods, partial scalar invariance was achieved across all but three national groups and across all languages represented in the BINS. There were large differences in latent SWLS means across nations and languages, but negligible-to-small differences across gender identities and age groups. Across nations, greater life satisfaction was significantly associated with greater financial security and being in a committed relationship or married. The results of this study suggest that the SWLS largely assesses a common unidimensional construct of life satisfaction irrespective of respondent characteristics (i.e., national group, gender identities, and age group) or survey presentation (i.e., survey language). This has important implications for the assessment of life satisfaction across nations and provides information that will be useful for practitioners aiming to promote subjective well-being internationally.

References
1.
Diener E . New findings and future directions for subjective well-being research. Am Psychol. 2012; 67(8):590-7. DOI: 10.1037/a0029541. View

2.
Joshanloo M . Do Cross-Group Differences in Life Satisfaction Reflect Measurement Bias or True Differences in Life Satisfaction? Evidence from a Dutch National Sample. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(18). PMC: 9517546. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811687. View

3.
Andersen N, Wimmelmann C, Mortensen E, Flensborg-Madsen T . Longitudinal associations of self-reported satisfaction with life and vitality with risk of mortality. J Psychosom Res. 2021; 147:110529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110529. View

4.
Putnick D, Bornstein M . Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research. Dev Rev. 2016; 41:71-90. PMC: 5145197. DOI: 10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004. View

5.
Jebb A, Morrison M, Tay L, Diener E . Subjective Well-Being Around the World: Trends and Predictors Across the Life Span. Psychol Sci. 2020; 31(3):293-305. DOI: 10.1177/0956797619898826. View