Discriminating Between the Maxillary Tuberosity and the Alveolar Tuberosity- a Critical Pictorial Review

Overview

Journal Surg Radiol Anat

Date 2025 Jan 22

PMID 39841293

Authors

Carol Antonio Dandoczi

Mugurel Constantin Rusu

Alexandru Nicolae Muresan

Razvan Costin Tudose

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The maxillary tuberosity, a critical anatomical landmark in dentistry and maxillofacial surgery, is burdened by terminological confusion. This inconsistency hampers clinical practice and communication across disciplines.

Method: Different resources were used to argue for the necessity of standardising the terminology related to maxillary tuberosity to enhance diagnostic precision and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Results: Most clinical and surgical studies dealing with the distal alveolar bone of the maxilla erroneously indicate it as "maxillary tuberosity". By recognising the diverse definitions of this structure, errors and misinterpretation of studies could be reduced, and interdisciplinary collaboration could be improved. The term "alveolar tuberosity" is recommended to refer specifically to the distal end of the alveolar process of the maxilla. Anatomically, the maxillary tuberosity belongs to the body of the maxilla and forms part of the posterior wall of the maxillary sinus; therefore, it should not be located in the alveolar process.

Conclusion: Adhering to the Terminologia Anatomica will clarify the critical clinical and surgical landmarks and enhance communication in clinical and academic settings.

References

Altay M, Sindel A, Yildirimyan N, Ozarslan M . Novel Technique for Reconstruction of the Severely Resorbed Posterior Maxillae: Tuberosity-Flip Approach. Implant Dent. 2017; 27(1):146-149. DOI: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000698. View

Zufia J, Abella Sans F . Applications of maxillary tuberosity block autograft. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022; 34(7):1015-1028. PMC: 9790261. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12911. View

Bidra A, Huynh-Ba G . Implants in the pterygoid region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40(8):773-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.04.007. View

Venturelli A . A modified surgical protocol for placing implants in the maxillary tuberosity: clinical results at 36 months after loading with fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996; 11(6):743-9. View

Konstantinovic V, Abd-Ul-Salam H, Jelovac D, Ivanjac F, Milicic B . Pterygoid and tuberosity implants in the atrophic posterior maxilla: A retrospective cohort study. J Prosthet Dent. 2023; 130(2):219.e1-219.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.06.007. View

Forloine A, Drum M, Reader A, Nusstein J, Beck M . A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the maxillary high tuberosity second division nerve block. J Endod. 2010; 36(11):1770-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.014. View

Ten Bruggenkate C, Kraaijenhagen H, VAN DER KWAST W, Krekeler G, Oosterbeek H . Autogenous maxillary bone grafts in conjunction with placement of I.T.I. endosseous implants. A preliminary report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992; 21(2):81-4. DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80537-5. View

Rusu M, Muresan A, Dandoczi C, Vrapciu A . Middle meatal nasal recesses of the maxillary sinuses and dangerously modified nasal anatomy. Anat Cell Biol. 2024; 57(3):463-467. PMC: 11424564. DOI: 10.5115/acb.24.023. View

Graves S . The pterygoid plate implant: a solution for restoring the posterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1994; 14(6):512-23. View

10.

Iwanaga J, Wilson C, Lachkar S, Tomaszewski K, Walocha J, Tubbs R . Clinical anatomy of the maxillary sinus: application to sinus floor augmentation. Anat Cell Biol. 2019; 52(1):17-24. PMC: 6449588. DOI: 10.5115/acb.2019.52.1.17. View

11.

Thangavelu K, Kumar N, Kannan R, Kumar J . Simple and safe posterior superior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Essays Res. 2015; 6(1):74-7. PMC: 4173426. DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.103379. View

12.

Raouf K, Chrcanovic B . Clinical Outcomes of Pterygoid and Maxillary Tuberosity Implants: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2024; 13(15). PMC: 11312960. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154544. View

13.

Kwak H, Park H, Yoon H, Kang M, Koh K, Kim H . Topographic anatomy of the inferior wall of the maxillary sinus in Koreans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004; 33(4):382-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.012. View

14.

Zucchelli G, Tavelli L, McGuire M, Rasperini G, Feinberg S, Wang H . Autogenous soft tissue grafting for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgical reconstruction. J Periodontol. 2019; 91(1):9-16. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.19-0350. View

15.

Manzanera E, Llorca P, Manzanera D, Garcia-Sanz V, Sada V, Paredes-Gallardo V . Anatomical study of the maxillary tuberosity using cone beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2018; 34(1):56-65. DOI: 10.1007/s11282-017-0284-x. View

16.

Underwood A . An Inquiry into the Anatomy and Pathology of the Maxillary Sinus. J Anat Physiol. 1910; 44(Pt 4):354-69. PMC: 1289237. View

17.

Maestre-Ferrin L, Galan-Gil S, Rubio-Serrano M, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Oltra D . Maxillary sinus septa: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009; 15(2):e383-6. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.15.e383. View

18.

Gu Y, Sun C, Wu D, Zhu Q, Leng D, Zhou Y . Evaluation of the relationship between maxillary posterior teeth and the maxillary sinus floor using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health. 2018; 18(1):164. PMC: 6171126. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0626-z. View

19.

Whyte A, Boeddinghaus R . The maxillary sinus: physiology, development and imaging anatomy. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019; 48(8):20190205. PMC: 6951102. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190205. View

20.

Lopez D, Olmos D, Morales M . Anatomical factors of the maxillary tuberosity that influence molar distalization. Korean J Orthod. 2024; 54(4):239-246. PMC: 11270146. DOI: 10.4041/kjod24.017. View