Association of Aortic Valve Size with the Degree of Aortic Valve Calcification in Severe High-gradient Aortic Stenosis

Overview

Journal Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging

Publisher Oxford University Press

Date 2025 Jan 15

PMID 39812179

Authors

Roya Anahita Mousavi

Gudrun Lamm

Maximilian Will

Andreas A Kammerlander

Philip Krackowizer

Petra Carmen Gunacker

Philipp Hobart

Nikolaus Voith

Marc Felix Gruninger

Konstantin Schwarz

Paul Vock

Uta C Hoppe

Julia Mascherbauer

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims: Less pronounced calcification of the aortic valve (AVC) was observed in women with aortic stenosis (AS) when compared with men. Since women have smaller aortic valves (AVs), this could explain a lower calcium load. We aimed to analyse the association of AV size with AVC independent from sex.

Methods And Results: Consecutive patients with high-gradient AS, who underwent cardiac computed tomography (CT), were assessed. AV annulus area and AVC with the Agatston score were measured on CT. In total, 601 patients (mean age 80 ± 7 years, 45% female) were included. Women had smaller AV annulus areas (4.12 ± 0.67 vs. 5.15 ± 0.78 cm2, P < 0.001) and lower Agatston scores [2018 (1456-3017) vs. 3394 (2562-4530), P < 0.001] than men. We found a significant correlation (r = 0.594, P < 0.001) and independent association (β = 926.20, P < 0.001) of AV annulus area with AVC. On separate regression analyses for men and women, AVC was independently associated with AV annulus area in both sexes (βmen = 887.77; βwomen = 863.48, both P < 0.001). When patients were stratified into AV size quartiles, patients in the lower quartiles were more likely to have AVC values below recommended sex-specific AVC thresholds. In the lowest quartile, 28% of female and 27% of male patients had Agatston scores below 1200 Agatston units (AU) (women) and 2000 AU (men), while this proportion decreased to 6 and 2%, respectively, in the quartiles with the largest annulus areas.

Conclusion: In high-gradient AS, AVC strongly depends on AV annulus area. This association is not dependent on sex. Thus, AVC should be indexed to AV size in addition to sex.

References

Mascherbauer J, Kammerlander A, Nitsche C, Bax J, Delgado V, Evangelista A . Sex-related differences in severe native valvular heart disease: the ESC-EORP Valvular Heart Disease II survey. Eur Heart J. 2024; 45(37):3818-3833. PMC: 11452747. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae523. View

Hamdan A, Barbash I, Schwammenthal E, Segev A, Kornowski R, Assali A . Sex differences in aortic root and vascular anatomy in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A computed-tomographic study. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2017; 11(2):87-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.01.006. View

Caballero L, Saura D, Oliva-Sandoval M, Gonzalez-Carrillo J, Espinosa M, Garcia-Navarro M . Three-Dimensional Morphology of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract: Impact on Grading Aortic Stenosis Severity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2016; 30(1):28-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2016.10.006. View

Clavel M, Pibarot P, Messika-Zeitoun D, Capoulade R, Malouf J, Aggarval S . Impact of aortic valve calcification, as measured by MDCT, on survival in patients with aortic stenosis: results of an international registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(12):1202-13. PMC: 4391203. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.05.066. View

Capoulade R, Clavel M, Le Ven F, Dahou A, Thebault C, Tastet L . Impact of left ventricular remodelling patterns on outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017; 18(12):1378-1387. PMC: 5837780. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jew288. View

Simard L, Cote N, Dagenais F, Mathieu P, Couture C, Trahan S . Sex-Related Discordance Between Aortic Valve Calcification and Hemodynamic Severity of Aortic Stenosis: Is Valvular Fibrosis the Explanation?. Circ Res. 2016; 120(4):681-691. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309306. View

Alskaf E, Kardos A . The mystery of defining aortic valve area: what have we learnt from three-dimensional imaging modalities?. J Echocardiogr. 2018; 16(3):130-138. DOI: 10.1007/s12574-018-0374-8. View

Agatston A, Janowitz W, HILDNER F, Zusmer N, VIAMONTE Jr M, Detrano R . Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15(4):827-32. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t. View

Pawade T, Clavel M, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus J, Mathieu T, Tastet L . Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11(3):e007146. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146. View

10.

Cartlidge T, Bing R, Kwiecinski J, Guzzetti E, Pawade T, Doris M . Contrast-enhanced computed tomography assessment of aortic stenosis. Heart. 2021; 107(23):1905-1911. PMC: 8600609. DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-318556. View

11.

Aggarwal S, Clavel M, Messika-Zeitoun D, Cueff C, Malouf J, Araoz P . Sex differences in aortic valve calcification measured by multidetector computed tomography in aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 6(1):40-7. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.112.980052. View

12.

Linde L, Carter-Storch R, Christensen N, Ovrehus K, Diederichsen A, Laursen K . Sex differences in aortic valve calcification in severe aortic valve stenosis: association between computer tomography assessed calcification and valvular calcium concentrations. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020; 22(5):581-588. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa096. View

13.

Powers A, Ali M, Lavoie N, Haujir A, Mogensen N, Ludwig S . Aortic Valve Calcification Density Measured by MDCT in the Assessment of Aortic Stenosis Severity. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 17(5):e016267. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.123.016267. View

14.

Kou S, Caballero L, Dulgheru R, Voilliot D, De Sousa C, Kacharava G . Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal cardiac chamber size: results from the NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 15(6):680-90. PMC: 4402333. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jet284. View

15.

Buellesfeld L, Stortecky S, Kalesan B, Gloekler S, Khattab A, Nietlispach F . Aortic root dimensions among patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013; 6(1):72-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.09.007. View

16.

Maffessanti F, Muraru D, Esposito R, Gripari P, Ermacora D, Santoro C . Age-, body size-, and sex-specific reference values for right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by three-dimensional echocardiography: a multicenter echocardiographic study in 507 healthy volunteers. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6(5):700-10. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000706. View

17.

Deslandes M, Paquin A, Guzzetti E, Beaudoin J, Barriault A, Salaun E . Sex-specific correlates of valvular and arterial calcification burden in patients with moderate aortic stenosis. Open Heart. 2022; 9(2). PMC: 9716845. DOI: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002139. View

18.

Otto C, Nishimura R, Bonow R, Carabello B, Erwin 3rd J, Gentile F . 2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2020; 143(5):e72-e227. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923. View

19.

Boulif J, Slimani A, Lazam S, de Meester C, Pierard S, Pasquet A . Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Aortic Stenosis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:673519. PMC: 8165166. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.673519. View

20.

Pfaffenberger S, Bartko P, Graf A, Pernicka E, Babayev J, Lolic E . Size matters! Impact of age, sex, height, and weight on the normal heart size. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 6(6):1073-9. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.000690. View