» Articles » PMID: 36455993

Sex-specific Correlates of Valvular and Arterial Calcification Burden in Patients with Moderate Aortic Stenosis

Overview
Journal Open Heart
Date 2022 Dec 1
PMID 36455993
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: There are significant sex differences in the prevalence and severity of cardiac calcifying processes. Women harbour more severe mitral annular calcification (MAC), while men exhibit worse aortic valve (AVC) and coronary artery (CAC) calcification. To better understand these differences, we investigated the correlates of cardiac calcification according to sex.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 406 patients with ≥mild aortic stenosis (AS) defined by an aortic valve area ≤1.5 cm, a peak aortic jet velocity >2.0 m/s, or a mean transvalvular gradient >15 mm Hg. Doppler-echocardiography and non-contrast multidetector CT were performed concomitantly to assess AS and cardiac calcifications.

Results: Mean age was 71±11 years and 33% were women. The AS haemodynamics were not significantly different between sexes (all p>0.50), with a mean indexed aortic valve area of 0.59±0.21 cm/m, peak aortic jet velocity of 2.78 (2.37-3.68) m/s, and mean gradient of 17.9 (12.8-31.3) mm Hg for the whole cohort. Compared with men, women harboured lower AVC (480 (222-1191) vs 1003 (484-2329) Agatston unit, AU; p<0.0001) and CAC (366 (50-914) vs 618 (167-1357) AU; p=0.007), but more severe MAC (60 (1-887) vs 48 (0-351) AU; p=0.08) and ascending aorta calcification (227 (43-863) vs 142 (7-493) AU; p=0.03). After comprehensive adjustment, sex remained an independent predictor of each cardiac calcification subtype (all p<0.02) except for the ascending aorta (p=0.32). In multivariable analysis, certain variables, like age or bicuspid aortic valve, were associated with the calcification scores in both sexes. Sex-specific predictors of calcification burden were absence of angiotensin receptor blockers (β=-0.26; p=0.007) and renal impairment (β=0.26; p=0.003) for AVC, and bisphosphonates (β=0.20; p=0.05) for CAC in women; coronary artery disease (β=0.25; p=0.001) for AVC, and angiotensin receptor blockers (β=0.19; p=0.02) and calcium/vitamin D (β=0.15; p=0.02) for MAC in men.

Conclusion: In AS, factors associated with cardiac valvular and arterial calcification differ between sexes, suggesting an important contributory role of sex in the pathophysiology of these calcifying processes.

Citing Articles

Association of aortic valve size with the degree of aortic valve calcification in severe high-gradient aortic stenosis.

Mousavi R, Lamm G, Will M, Kammerlander A, Krackowizer P, Gunacker P Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2025; 26(3):557-565.

PMID: 39812179 PMC: 11879159. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaf002.


Sex-Related Differences in the Pathophysiology, Cardiac Imaging, and Clinical Outcomes of Aortic Stenosis: A Narrative Review.

Dahou A, Awasthi V, Bkhache M, Djellal M, Yang X, Wang H J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518498 PMC: 11546237. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216359.


Sex-related disparities in aortic stenosis from disease awareness to treatment: a state-of-the-art review.

Appleby C, Bleiziffer S, Bramlage P, Delgado V, Eltchaninoff H, Gebhard C J Thorac Dis. 2024; 16(9):6308-6319.

PMID: 39444914 PMC: 11494558. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-406.


Noncontrast cardiac computed tomography-derived mitral annular calcification scores in mitral valve disease.

Hou J, Sun Y, Wang H, Zhang L, Shi J, You H Clin Cardiol. 2023; 46(11):1310-1318.

PMID: 37501607 PMC: 10642324. DOI: 10.1002/clc.24110.

References
1.
Parker B, Schurgers L, Vermeer C, Schiller N, Whooley M, Ix J . The association of uncarboxylated matrix Gla protein with mitral annular calcification differs by diabetes status: The Heart and Soul study. Atherosclerosis. 2009; 210(1):320-5. PMC: 2862076. DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.11.023. View

2.
Lee W, Cheung A, Cape D, Zinman B . Impact of diabetes on coronary artery disease in women and men: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(7):962-8. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.962. View

3.
Clavel M, Messika-Zeitoun D, Pibarot P, Aggarwal S, Malouf J, Araoz P . The complex nature of discordant severe calcified aortic valve disease grading: new insights from combined Doppler echocardiographic and computed tomographic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 62(24):2329-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1621. View

4.
Pawade T, Clavel M, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus J, Mathieu T, Tastet L . Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018; 11(3):e007146. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146. View

5.
Ivanov V, Osovska N, Baranova O, Iuzvyshyna O, Savitska Y, Khomovskyi V . Gender differences in clinical factors associated with coronary artery atherosclerosis severity in patients with aortic valve and/or mitral annulus calcification. Wiad Lek. 2018; 71(6):1147-1154. View