» Articles » PMID: 39797097

Electromyographic Diagnostic Ranges Defining Temporomandibular Disorders and Healthy Individuals' Results in Functional Clenching Index

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Date 2025 Jan 11
PMID 39797097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) represent a significant public health issue, among which masticatory muscle pain is the most common. Current publications increasingly indicate surface electromyography (sEMG) as an effective diagnostic tool for muscle dysfunctions that may be employed in TMDs recognition. The objective of this study was to establish reference ranges for TMDs patients with masticatory muscle pain and healthy individuals in the electromyographic Functional Clenching Index (FCI) for the temporalis muscles (TAs) and masseter muscles (MMs). This research aimed to provide an additional diagnostic tool for TMDs patients. : A total of 48 individuals ( = 30 women and = 18 men) with the muscular painful form of TMDs were recruited alongside a numerically and gender-matched control group-healthy, pain-free controls. The Functional Clenching Indexwas calculated for both groups. : Data analysis revealed statistically significant differences with a very large effect size. Healthy individuals had higher FCI scores compared to those with TMDs. The healthy group exhibited higher threshold values compared to the TMDs group. : For healthy individuals, the FCI ranges for TAs were between 58 and 145, while for MMs, between 72 and 210. Lower values may indicate muscle activation disorders and occur in patients with the painful, muscular form of TMDs. This is the first study to define reference ranges for electromyographic indices; therefore, caution is recommended, and the replication of this study on a larger and more culturally diverse sample is advised.

Citing Articles

Women are worse off in developing and recovering from temporomandibular disorder symptoms.

Lovgren A, Vallin S, Haggman-Henrikson B, Kapos F, Peck C, Visscher C Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4732.

PMID: 39922904 PMC: 11807177. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-86502-0.

References
1.
Murray G, Peck C . Orofacial pain and jaw muscle activity: a new model. J Orofac Pain. 2007; 21(4):263-78. View

2.
Zielinski G, Pajak-Zielinska B . Association between Estrogen Levels and Temporomandibular Disorders: An Updated Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(18). PMC: 11432328. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25189867. View

3.
Ahuja V, Ranjan V, Passi D, Jaiswal R . Study of stress-induced temporomandibular disorders among dental students: An institutional study. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2018; 9(2):147-154. PMC: 6251286. DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_20_18. View

4.
Berni K, Dibai-Filho A, Pires P, Rodrigues-Bigaton D . Accuracy of the surface electromyography RMS processing for the diagnosis of myogenous temporomandibular disorder. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015; 25(4):596-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.05.004. View

5.
Heller G, Manuguerra M, Chow R . How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain. 2017; 13:67-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.012. View