» Articles » PMID: 36265519

The Clinical Meaning of the Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve for the Evaluation of the Performance of Disease Markers

Overview
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Oct 20
PMID 36265519
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) is a popular measure of pure diagnostic accuracy that is independent from the proportion of diseased subjects in the analysed sample. However, its actual usefulness in the clinical context has been questioned, because it does not seem to be directly related to the actual performance of a diagnostic marker in identifying diseased and non-diseased subjects in real clinical settings. This study evaluates the relationship between the AUC and the proportion of correct classifications (global diagnostic accuracy, GDA) in relation to the shape of the corresponding ROC curves.

Methods: We demonstrate that AUC represents an upward-biased measure of GDA at an optimal accuracy cut-off for balanced groups. The magnitude of bias depends on the shape of the ROC plot and on the proportion of diseased and non-diseased subjects. In proper curves, the bias is independent from the diseased/non-diseased ratio and can be easily estimated and removed. Moreover, a comparison between 2 partial AUCs can be replaced by a more powerful test for the corresponding whole AUCs.

Results: Applications to 3 real datasets are provided: a marker for a hormone deficit in children, 2 tumour markers for malignant mesothelioma, and 2 gene expression profiles in ovarian cancer patients.

Conclusions: The AUC is a measure of accuracy with potential clinical relevance for the evaluation of disease markers. The clinical meaning of ROC parameters should always be evaluated with an analysis of the shape of the corresponding ROC curve.

Citing Articles

Identification and validation of five ferroptosis-related molecular signatures in keloids based on multiple transcriptome data analysis.

Sun Z, Qin Y, Zhang X Front Mol Biosci. 2025; 11():1490745.

PMID: 39834787 PMC: 11743277. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1490745.


Electromyographic Diagnostic Ranges Defining Temporomandibular Disorders and Healthy Individuals' Results in Functional Clenching Index.

Zielinski G, Ginszt M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797097 PMC: 11721712. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010014.


Predicting lack of clinical improvement following varicose vein ablation using machine learning.

Li B, Eisenberg N, Beaton D, Lee D, Al-Omran L, Wijeysundera D J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024; 13(3):102162.

PMID: 39732288 PMC: 11803835. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.102162.


Predicting the potential distribution of Astragali Radix in China under climate change adopting the MaxEnt model.

Wen Z, Yan K, Zhang M, Ma R, Zhu X, Duan Q Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1505985.

PMID: 39711593 PMC: 11659014. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1505985.


A machine learning-based prediction of hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated ICU patients.

Li H, Ashrafi N, Kang C, Zhao G, Chen Y, Pishgar M PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0309383.

PMID: 39231126 PMC: 11373795. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309383.


References
1.
Bandos A, Guo B, Gur D . Jackknife variance of the partial area under the empirical receiver operating characteristic curve. Stat Methods Med Res. 2014; 26(2):528-541. PMC: 5133195. DOI: 10.1177/0962280214551190. View

2.
Lee W, Hsiao C . Alternative summary indices for the receiver operating characteristic curve. Epidemiology. 1996; 7(6):605-11. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199611000-00007. View

3.
Cook N . Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction. Circulation. 2007; 115(7):928-35. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.672402. View

4.
Pepe M, Fan J, Feng Z, Gerds T, Hilden J . The Net Reclassification Index (NRI): a Misleading Measure of Prediction Improvement Even with Independent Test Data Sets. Stat Biosci. 2015; 7(2):282-295. PMC: 4615606. DOI: 10.1007/s12561-014-9118-0. View

5.
Erdreich L, Lee E . Use of relative operating characteristic analysis in epidemiology. A method for dealing with subjective judgement. Am J Epidemiol. 1981; 114(5):649-62. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113236. View