» Articles » PMID: 39796654

Impact of the Number of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes on Risk of Para-Aortic Recurrence in Patients with Clinically Early Cervical Cancer Treated by a Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Date 2025 Jan 11
PMID 39796654
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend the extension of the pelvic radiotherapy volume to the para-aortic region in locally advanced cervical cancer and ≥3 suspicious pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) on imaging. Whether this recommendation is also valid for clinically early stages is uncertain. The objective of this study was to investigate the para-aortic (PAO) lymph node recurrence rate in patients with early-stage cervical cancer, ≥3 metastatic PLN, and negative common iliac nodes after a radical hysterectomy followed by pelvic (chemo)radiotherapy without extension to the PAO region.

Methods: Consecutive patients, surgically treated between 2000 and 2020, with FIGO 2009 stage IB2-IIA1 and positive PLN, were included in this retrospective cohort study. The frequency of PAO recurrences, disease-free survival, and overall survival were analyzed in patients with <3 versus ≥3 positive PLN.

Results: In 127 patients, the isolated PAO recurrence rate was 2/88 (2.3%) versus 1/39 (2.6%) for patients with <3 versus ≥3 positive PLNs, respectively ( = 0.671). The 5-year disease-free survival (87.3% versus 73.7%; = 0.088) and the overall survival (90.7% versus 76.5%; = 0.355) between patients with <3 versus ≥3 positive PLN was not significantly different.

Conclusions: Isolated PAO nodal recurrence rate in women with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, with positive PLN but negative common iliac nodes, followed by pelvic (chemo)radiotherapy, is low and did not differ between the groups with <3 versus ≥3 positive PLN. This makes it unlikely that the inclusion of the PAO region in the adjuvant radiotherapy volume would result in a better oncological outcome.

References
1.
Holloway S, Mercadel A, Miller D, Lea J . Isolated para-aortic nodal recurrence after treatment of early stage cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 170:248-253. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.01.031. View

2.
Bogani G, Vinti D, Murgia F, Chiappa V, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Martinelli F . Burden of lymphatic disease predicts efficacy of adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy in FIGO 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019; 29(9):1355-1360. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000669. View

3.
Matsuo K, Shimada M, Saito T, Takehara K, Tokunaga H, Watanabe Y . Risk stratification models for para-aortic lymph node metastasis and recurrence in stage IB-IIB cervical cancer. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 29(1):e11. PMC: 5709521. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2018.29.e11. View

4.
Cibula D, Dostalek L, Jarkovsky J, Mom C, Lopez A, Falconer H . The annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2021; 158:111-122. PMC: 9406128. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.008. View

5.
Seino M, Nagase S, Tokunaga H, Yamagami W, Kobayashi Y, Tabata T . Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2022 guidelines for uterine cervical neoplasm treatment. J Gynecol Oncol. 2023; 35(1):e15. PMC: 10792216. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e15. View