» Articles » PMID: 28785898

2017 Update on the Querleu-Morrow Classification of Radical Hysterectomy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg Oncol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2017 Aug 9
PMID 28785898
Citations 90
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: One of the most important principles in modern cervical cancer surgery is the concept of tailoring surgical radicality. In practice, this means abandoning the "one-fits-all" concept in favor of tailored operations. The term "radical hysterectomy" is used to describe many different procedures, each with a different degree of radicality. Anatomic structures are subjected to artificial dissection artifacts, as well as different interpretations and nomenclatures. This study aimed to refine and standardize the principles and descriptions of the different classes of radical hysterectomy as defined in the Querleu-Morrow classification and to propose its universal applicability.

Methods: All three authors independently examined the current literature and undertook a critical assessment of the original classification. Images and pathologic slides demonstrating different types of radical hysterectomy were examined to document a consensual vision of the anatomy. The Cibula 3-D concept also was included in this update.

Results: The Querleu-Morrow classification is based on the lateral extent of resection. Four types of radical hysterectomy are described, including a limited number of subtypes when necessary. Two major objectives remain constant: excision of central tumor with clear margins and removal of any potential sites of nodal metastasis.

Conclusion: Studies evaluating radicality in the surgical management of cervical cancer should be based on precise, universally accepted descriptions. The authors' updated classification presents standardized, universally applicable descriptions of different types of hysterectomies performed worldwide, categorized according to degree of radicality, independently of theoretical considerations.

Citing Articles

A Modified Nerve Preservation Technique in Radical Hysterectomy: Three-Dimensional Precise Dissection of Paracolpium.

Na J, Li Y, Wang J, Han S Surg J (N Y). 2025; 10(4):e62-e64.

PMID: 40034997 PMC: 11661888. DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1800979.


Evaluation of reproductive and oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in cervical cancer patients with tumor > 2 cm.

Bahrehmand K, Vesztergom D, Budai B, Lengyel D, Lukacs E, Novak Z Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2025; 57:101688.

PMID: 39996154 PMC: 11848102. DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2025.101688.


The Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Mesonephric Tumours of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review and Proposal of Embryologically-Oriented Surgical Resection.

Daas M, Pappa C, Shibli D, Al-Ani A, Dhar S, Manek S J Clin Med. 2025; 14(1.

PMID: 39797200 PMC: 11721025. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14010117.


Impact of the Number of Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes on Risk of Para-Aortic Recurrence in Patients with Clinically Early Cervical Cancer Treated by a Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy.

Schoonhoven F, Aarts J, Fons G, Stalpers L, van Lonkhuijzen L, van der Velden J Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796654 PMC: 11718765. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010023.


Ultrasound assessment of the pelvic sidewall: methodological consensus opinion.

Fischerova D, Culcasi C, Gatti E, Ng Z, Burgetova A, Szabo G Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024; 65(1):94-105.

PMID: 39499650 PMC: 11693842. DOI: 10.1002/uog.29122.


References
1.
Piver M, Rutledge F, Smith J . Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974; 44(2):265-72. View

2.
Benedetti-Panici P, Maneschi F, DAndrea G, Cutillo G, Rabitti C, Congiu M . Early cervical carcinoma: the natural history of lymph node involvement redefined on the basis of thorough parametrectomy and giant section study. Cancer. 2000; 88(10):2267-74. View

3.
Whitmore I . Terminologia anatomica: new terminology for the new anatomist. Anat Rec. 1999; 257(2):50-3. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990415)257:2<50::AID-AR4>3.0.CO;2-W. View

4.
Kimmig R, Aktas B, Buderath P, Rusch P, Heubner M . Intraoperative navigation in robotically assisted compartmental surgery of uterine cancer by visualisation of embryologically derived lymphatic networks with indocyanine-green (ICG). J Surg Oncol. 2016; 113(5):554-9. PMC: 6221053. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24174. View

5.
Cibula D, Abu-Rustum N, Benedetti-Panici P, Kohler C, Raspagliesi F, Querleu D . New classification system of radical hysterectomy: emphasis on a three-dimensional anatomic template for parametrial resection. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 122(2):264-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.029. View