Beyond Misfolding: A New Paradigm for the Relationship Between Protein Folding and Aggregation

Overview

Journal Int J Mol Sci

Publisher MDPI

Date 2025 Jan 11

PMID 39795912

Authors

Seong Il Choi

Yoontae Jin

Yura Choi

Baik L Seong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aggregation is intricately linked to protein folding, necessitating a precise understanding of their relationship. Traditionally, aggregation has been viewed primarily as a sequential consequence of protein folding and misfolding. However, this conventional paradigm is inherently incomplete and can be deeply misleading. Remarkably, it fails to adequately explain how intrinsic and extrinsic factors, such as charges and cellular macromolecules, prevent intermolecular aggregation independently of intramolecular protein folding and structure. The pervasive inconsistencies between protein folding and aggregation call for a new framework. In all combined reactions of molecules, both intramolecular and intermolecular rate (or equilibrium) constants are mutually independent; accordingly, intrinsic and extrinsic factors independently affect both rate constants. This universal principle, when applied to protein folding and aggregation, indicates that they should be treated as two independent yet interconnected processes. Based on this principle, a new framework provides groundbreaking insights into misfolding, Anfinsen's thermodynamic hypothesis, molecular chaperones, intrinsic chaperone-like activities of cellular macromolecules, intermolecular repulsive force-driven aggregation inhibition, proteome solubility maintenance, and proteinopathies. Consequently, this paradigm shift not only refines our current understanding but also offers a more comprehensive view of how aggregation is coupled to protein folding in the complex cellular milieu.

References

Agashe V, Guha S, Chang H, Genevaux P, Hayer-Hartl M, Stemp M . Function of trigger factor and DnaK in multidomain protein folding: increase in yield at the expense of folding speed. Cell. 2004; 117(2):199-209. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00299-5. View

Koldewey P, Stull F, Horowitz S, Martin R, Bardwell J . Forces Driving Chaperone Action. Cell. 2016; 166(2):369-379. PMC: 4947014. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.05.054. View

Bukau B, Horwich A . The Hsp70 and Hsp60 chaperone machines. Cell. 1998; 92(3):351-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80928-9. View

Li Y, Roberts C . Lumry-Eyring nucleated-polymerization model of protein aggregation kinetics. 2. Competing growth via condensation and chain polymerization. J Phys Chem B. 2009; 113(19):7020-32. PMC: 2683240. DOI: 10.1021/jp8083088. View

Dill K . Dominant forces in protein folding. Biochemistry. 1990; 29(31):7133-55. DOI: 10.1021/bi00483a001. View

Geiss-Friedlander R, Melchior F . Concepts in sumoylation: a decade on. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007; 8(12):947-56. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2293. View

Mayer M, Schroder H, Rudiger S, Paal K, Laufen T, Bukau B . Multistep mechanism of substrate binding determines chaperone activity of Hsp70. Nat Struct Biol. 2000; 7(7):586-93. DOI: 10.1038/76819. View

Wang W, Nema S, Teagarden D . Protein aggregation--pathways and influencing factors. Int J Pharm. 2010; 390(2):89-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.02.025. View

King O, Gitler A, Shorter J . The tip of the iceberg: RNA-binding proteins with prion-like domains in neurodegenerative disease. Brain Res. 2012; 1462:61-80. PMC: 3372647. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.016. View

10.

Vendruscolo M, Knowles T, Dobson C . Protein solubility and protein homeostasis: a generic view of protein misfolding disorders. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011; 3(12). PMC: 3225949. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a010454. View

11.

Ellis R . Molecular chaperones. Opening and closing the Anfinsen cage. Curr Biol. 1994; 4(7):633-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(00)00140-8. View

12.

Hartl F, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M . Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature. 2011; 475(7356):324-32. DOI: 10.1038/nature10317. View

13.

Silow M, Oliveberg M . Transient aggregates in protein folding are easily mistaken for folding intermediates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(12):6084-6. PMC: 21005. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.12.6084. View

14.

Bhopatkar A, Kayed R . Flanking regions, amyloid cores, and polymorphism: the potential interplay underlying structural diversity. J Biol Chem. 2023; 299(9):105122. PMC: 10482755. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105122. View

15.

Craig E, Eisenman H, Hundley H . Ribosome-tethered molecular chaperones: the first line of defense against protein misfolding?. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003; 6(2):157-62. DOI: 10.1016/s1369-5274(03)00030-4. View

16.

Zou Z, Cao L, Zhou P, Su Y, Sun Y, Li W . Hyper-acidic protein fusion partners improve solubility and assist correct folding of recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2008; 135(4):333-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2008.05.007. View

17.

Coquerel G . Crystallization of molecular systems from solution: phase diagrams, supersaturation and other basic concepts. Chem Soc Rev. 2014; 43(7):2286-300. DOI: 10.1039/c3cs60359h. View

18.

DAVIS G, Elisee C, Newham D, HARRISON R . New fusion protein systems designed to give soluble expression in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1999; 65(4):382-8. View

19.

Valastyan J, Lindquist S . Mechanisms of protein-folding diseases at a glance. Dis Model Mech. 2014; 7(1):9-14. PMC: 3882043. DOI: 10.1242/dmm.013474. View

20.

Uhlen M, Fagerberg L, Hallstrom B, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A . Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015; 347(6220):1260419. DOI: 10.1126/science.1260419. View