Segmentation of the Iliac Crest from CT-data for Virtual Surgical Planning of Facial Reconstruction Surgery Using Deep Learning

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2025 Jan 8

PMID 39773990

Authors

Stefan Raith

Tobias Pankert

Jonatas de Souza Nascimento

Srikrishna Jaganathan

Florian Peters

Mathias Wien

Frank Holzle

Ali Modabber

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Objectives: For the planning of surgical procedures involving the bony reconstruction of the mandible, the autologous iliac crest graft, along with the fibula graft, has become established as a preferred donor region. While computer-assisted planning methods are increasingly gaining importance, the necessary preparation of geometric data based on CT imaging remains largely a manual process. The aim of this work was to develop and test a method for the automated segmentation of the iliac crest for subsequent reconstruction planning.

Methods: A total of 1,398 datasets with manual segmentations were obtained as ground truth, with a subset of 400 datasets used for training and validation of the Neural Networks and another subset of 177 datasets used solely for testing. A deep Convolutional Neural Network implemented in a 3D U-Net architecture using Tensorflow was employed to provide a pipeline for automatic segmentation. Transfer learning was applied for model training optimization. Evaluation metrics included the Dice Similarity Coefficient, Symmetrical Average Surface Distance, and a modified 95% Hausdorff Distance focusing on regions relevant for transplantation.

Results: The automated segmentation achieved high accuracy, with qualitative and quantitative assessments demonstrating predictions closely aligned with ground truths. Quantitative evaluation of the correspondence yielded values for geometric agreement in the transplant-relevant area of 92% +/- 7% (Dice coefficient) and average surface deviations of 0.605 +/- 0.41 mm. In all cases, the bones were identified as contiguous objects in the correct spatial orientation. The geometries of the iliac crests were consistently and completely recognized on both sides without any gaps.

Conclusions: The method was successfully used to extract the individual geometries of the iliac crest from CT data. Thus, it has the potential to serve as an essential starting point in a digitized planning process and to provide data for subsequent surgical planning. The complete automation of this step allows for efficient and reliable preparation of anatomical data for reconstructive surgeries.

References

Ulbrich M, Van den Bosch V, Bonsch A, Gruber L, Ooms M, Melchior C . Advantages of a Training Course for Surgical Planning in Virtual Reality for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: Crossover Study. JMIR Serious Games. 2023; 11:e40541. PMC: 9947820. DOI: 10.2196/40541. View

van Baar G, Schipper K, Forouzanfar T, Leeuwrik L, Winters H, Ridwan-Pramana A . Accuracy of Computer-Assisted Surgery in Maxillary Reconstruction: A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(6). PMC: 8002284. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061226. View

Al-Sabahi M, Jamali O, Shindy M, Moussa B, Amin A, Zedan M . Aesthetic Reconstruction of Onco-surgical Mandibular Defects Using Free Fibular Flap with and without CAD/CAM Customized Osteotomy Guide: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1):1252. PMC: 9717507. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10322-y. View

Pucci R, Weyh A, Smotherman C, Valentini V, Bunnell A, Fernandes R . Accuracy of virtual planned surgery versus conventional free-hand surgery for reconstruction of the mandible with osteocutaneous free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020; 49(9):1153-1161. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.018. View

Modabber A, Ayoub N, Redick T, Gesenhues J, Kniha K, Mohlhenrich S . Comparison of augmented reality and cutting guide technology in assisted harvesting of iliac crest grafts - A cadaver study. Ann Anat. 2021; 239:151834. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151834. View

Bak M, Jacobson A, Buchbinder D, Urken M . Contemporary reconstruction of the mandible. Oral Oncol. 2009; 46(2):71-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.11.006. View

Hemke R, Buckless C, Tsao A, Wang B, Torriani M . Deep learning for automated segmentation of pelvic muscles, fat, and bone from CT studies for body composition assessment. Skeletal Radiol. 2019; 49(3):387-395. PMC: 6980503. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03289-8. View

van Eijnatten M, van Dijk R, Dobbe J, Streekstra G, Koivisto J, Wolff J . CT image segmentation methods for bone used in medical additive manufacturing. Med Eng Phys. 2017; 51:6-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.10.008. View

Taylor G, Townsend P, Corlett R . Superiority of the deep circumflex iliac vessels as the supply for free groin flaps. Clinical work. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979; 64(6):745-59. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197912000-00001. View

10.

Pankert T, Lee H, Peters F, Holzle F, Modabber A, Raith S . Mandible segmentation from CT data for virtual surgical planning using an augmented two-stepped convolutional neural network. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2023; 18(8):1479-1488. PMC: 10363055. DOI: 10.1007/s11548-022-02830-w. View

11.

Chan T, Long C, Wang E, Prisman E . The state of virtual surgical planning in maxillary Reconstruction: A systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2022; 133:106058. DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.106058. View

12.

Deepak S, Ameer P . Brain tumor classification using deep CNN features via transfer learning. Comput Biol Med. 2019; 111:103345. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103345. View

13.

Narayan Das N, Kumar N, Kaur M, Kumar V, Singh D . Automated Deep Transfer Learning-Based Approach for Detection of COVID-19 Infection in Chest X-rays. Ing Rech Biomed. 2020; 43(2):114-119. PMC: 7333623. DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2020.07.001. View

14.

Jewer D, Boyd J, Manktelow R, Zuker R, Rosen I, Gullane P . Orofacial and mandibular reconstruction with the iliac crest free flap: a review of 60 cases and a new method of classification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989; 84(3):391-403; discussion 404-5. View

15.

Sun L, Shao W, Wang M, Zhang D, Liu M . High-order Feature Learning for Multi-atlas based Label Fusion: Application to Brain Segmentation with MRI. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2019; . DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2019.2952079. View

16.

Probst F, Liokatis P, Mast G, Ehrenfeld M . Virtual planning for mandible resection and reconstruction. Innov Surg Sci. 2023; 8(3):137-148. PMC: 10709695. DOI: 10.1515/iss-2021-0045. View

17.

Modabber A, Rauen A, Ayoub N, Mohlhenrich S, Peters F, Kniha K . Evaluation of a novel algorithm for automating virtual surgical planning in mandibular reconstruction using fibula flaps. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019; 47(9):1378-1386. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.06.013. View

18.

Bartier S, Mazzaschi O, Benichou L, Sauvaget E . Computer-assisted versus traditional technique in fibular free-flap mandibular reconstruction: A CT symmetry study. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2020; 138(1):23-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2020.06.011. View

19.

Ma J, Chen J, Ng M, Huang R, Li Y, Li C . Loss odyssey in medical image segmentation. Med Image Anal. 2021; 71:102035. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102035. View

20.

Schlemper J, Oktay O, Schaap M, Heinrich M, Kainz B, Glocker B . Attention gated networks: Learning to leverage salient regions in medical images. Med Image Anal. 2019; 53:197-207. PMC: 7610718. DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2019.01.012. View