» Articles » PMID: 20036611

Contemporary Reconstruction of the Mandible

Overview
Journal Oral Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2009 Dec 29
PMID 20036611
Citations 77
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reconstruction of the mandible has evolved significantly over the last 40years. Early attempts were often disfiguring and wrought with complications but with the introduction of free tissue transfer of well vascularized bone in the 1970's there was a significant improvement in outcomes. In recent years the harvest, inset, and microvascular anatomosis have been refined to the point that success rates are reported as high as 99% throughout the literature. Focus has now shifted to optimizing functional and aesthetic outcomes after mandible reconstruction. This paper will be a review defect classification, goals of reconstruction, the various donor sites, dental rehabilitation, new advances, and persistent problems. Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects after ablative surgery is best accomplished using free tissue transfer to restore mandibular continuity and function. Reestablishing occlusion and optimizing tongue mobility are important to post-operative oral function. Persistent problems in oro-mandibular reconstruction relate to the effects of radiation treatment on the native tissue and include xerostomia, dysgeusia, osteoradionecrosis and trismus. These problems continue to plague the oral cancer patient despite the significant advances that allow a far more complete functional restoration than could be accomplished a mere two decades ago.

Citing Articles

Segmentation of the iliac crest from CT-data for virtual surgical planning of facial reconstruction surgery using deep learning.

Raith S, Pankert T, de Souza Nascimento J, Jaganathan S, Peters F, Wien M Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1097.

PMID: 39773990 PMC: 11707128. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83031-0.


Comparison of the Outcome of Free Iliac Bone Graft and Vascularized Iliac Bone Graft in Reconstruction of Mandibular Defects: A Systematic Review.

Dalband M, Badkoobeh A, Alam M, Motie P, Tabrizi R J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024; 23(6):1371-1378.

PMID: 39618464 PMC: 11607275. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-023-02101-4.


Reconstruction of Composite Mandible Defects Using a Cellular Bone Allograft and Soft Tissue Free Flap Coverage.

Carlson K, Liebman R, Bak M, Dougherty W, Mark J Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2024; 17(4):NP21-NP30.

PMID: 39553814 PMC: 11563019. DOI: 10.1177/19433875241237920.


Analysis of changes in bone mineral density and cortical bone thickness after reconstruction of the mandible with fibula, is condyle preservation a critical influence factor?.

Yang Y, Xie S, Kang Y, Li X, Chen H, Shan X Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(11):622.

PMID: 39482400 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-06027-0.


Identification of peroneal artery perforators using non-contrast-enhanced T2prep multi-shot gradient echo planar imaging MRA.

Shigenaga Y, Osaki T, Murai N, Kamino S, Nakao K, Kawasaki R Radiol Phys Technol. 2024; 17(3):610-619.

PMID: 38805078 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-024-00799-6.