» Articles » PMID: 39767600

Observational Study of Trans-Septal Endocardial Left Ventricle Lead Implant for Effective Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure and Challenging Coronary Sinus Anatomy

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2025 Jan 8
PMID 39767600
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: When conventional trans-venous CS lead placement fails, trans-septal endocardial left ventricle lead placement is an alternative technique used to capture the left ventricle endocardially; however, its use is limited due to a lack of evidence, practice uptake, and clinical trials.

Methods: In this single-center cohort study, we evaluated the efficiency of the procedure, post-procedural complication rate, rate of thromboembolic events, overall survival rate, and changes in the echocardiographic parameters, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, both before and after TSLV lead implantation.

Results: The TSLV lead implant is safe and improves EF, LVEDV, LVESV, and LVIDd. It significantly reduces the NTproBNP levels and the NYHA class; however, the rate of stroke incidence remains high, at 9%.

Conclusions: We demonstrated a high success rate of trans-septal left ventricular endocardial lead implantation, LV reverse remodeling was noted, and patients had a favorable clinical response; however, there was an increased risk of systemic embolization after the trans-septal LV lead implant.

References
1.
Kutyifa V, Kloppe A, Zareba W, Solomon S, McNitt S, Polonsky S . The influence of left ventricular ejection fraction on the effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy: MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61(9):936-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.051. View

2.
Miller A, Kramer D, Lewis E, Koplan B, Epstein L, Tedrow U . Event-free survival following CRT with surgically implanted LV leads versus standard transvenous approach. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011; 34(4):490-500. PMC: 3079428. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.03014.x. View

3.
Cleland J, Daubert J, Erdmann E, Freemantle N, Gras D, Kappenberger L . The CARE-HF study (CArdiac REsynchronisation in Heart Failure study): rationale, design and end-points. Eur J Heart Fail. 2001; 3(4):481-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-9842(01)00176-3. View

4.
Pujol-Lopez M, Jimenez-Arjona R, Garre P, Guasch E, Borras R, Doltra A . Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Pacing in Heart Failure and Wide QRS Patients: LEVEL-AT Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022; 8(11):1431-1445. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.08.001. View

5.
Nelson K, Bates M, Turley A, Linker N, Owens W . Video-assisted thoracoscopic left ventricular pacing in patients with and without previous sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 95(3):907-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.11.022. View