Artificial Intelligence-enhanced Navigation for Nerve Recognition and Surgical Education in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery

Overview

Journal Surg Endosc

Publisher Springer

Specialties Gastroenterology
General Surgery
Radiology

Date 2025 Jan 6

PMID 39762611

Authors

Shunjin Ryu

Yuta Imaizumi

Keisuke Goto

Sotaro Iwauchi

Takehiro Kobayashi

Ryusuke Ito

Yukio Nakabayashi

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Devices that help educate young doctors and enable safe, minimally invasive surgery are needed. Eureka is a surgical artificial intelligence (AI) system that can intraoperatively highlight loose connective tissues (LCTs) in the dissected layers and nerves in the surgical field displayed on a monitor. In this study, we examined whether AI navigation (AIN) with Eureka can assist trainees in recognizing nerves during colorectal surgery.

Methods: In left-sided colorectal surgery (n = 51, between July 2023 and February 2024), Eureka was connected to the laparoscopic system side by side, and the nerve was highlighted on the monitor during the surgery. We examined the rate of failure to recognize nerves by trainee surgeons over a total of 101 scenarios after it was recognized intraoperatively by the supervising surgeon (certified by the Japanese Society of Endoscopic Surgery). We also examined the frequency of nerve recognition by the trainee physicians viewing the Eureka monitor when recognition was not possible (recognition assistance rate).

Results: The nerve recognition failure rate and recognition assistance rate with AIN were as follows: right hypogastric nerve during sigmoid colon mobilization, 44/101 (43.6%) and 19/44 (43.2%); left hypogastric nerves during dissection of the dorsal rectum, 27/101 (26.7%) and 13/27 (48.1%); right lumbar splanchnic nerves, 32/101 (31.7%) and 29/32 (90.6%); left lumbar splanchnic nerves, 44/101 (43.6%) and 39/44 (88.6%); and pelvic visceral nerves during dissection of the dorsal rectum, 29/45 (64.4%) and 6/29 (20.7%), respectively.

Conclusion: Although the rate of recognition with assistance from AIN differed for the different nerves, this system can potentially assist in anatomic recognition, enhance surgical education, and contribute to nerve preservation.

Trial Registration: Improvement of AI navigation in minimally invasive surgery and examination of its intraoperative support and educational effectiveness. Research Ethics Committee of the Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center (Saitama, Japan) approval number: 2022-27.

References

Brajcich B, Stulberg J, Palis B, Chung J, Huang R, Nelson H . Association Between Surgical Technical Skill and Long-term Survival for Colon Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 7(1):127-129. PMC: 7600051. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.5462. View

Katayama H, Inomata M, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, Watanabe M, Akagi T . Institutional variation in survival and morbidity in laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: From the data of a randomized controlled trial comparing open and laparoscopic surgery (JCOG0404). Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021; 5(6):823-831. PMC: 8560602. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12484. View

Jacobson C, Harbaugh C, Agbedinu K, Kwakye G . Colorectal Cancer Outcomes: A Comparative Review of Resource-Limited Settings in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and Rural America. Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(19). PMC: 11475417. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16193302. View

Ichikawa N, Homma S, Funakoshi T, Ohshima T, Hirose K, Yamada K . Impact of technically qualified surgeons on laparoscopic colorectal resection outcomes: results of a propensity score-matching analysis. BJS Open. 2020; 4(3):486-498. PMC: 7260420. DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50263. View

Guillou P, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne D, Smith A . Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365(9472):1718-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2. View

Lu P, McCarty J, Fields A, Azzeh M, Goldberg J, Irani J . The Distribution of Colorectal Surgeons in the United States. J Surg Res. 2020; 251:71-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.01.015. View

Goto K, Watanabe J, Nagasaki T, Uemura M, Ozawa H, Kurose Y . Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on conversion to laparotomy after low anterior resection for rectal cancer in Japan (a secondary analysis of the EnSSURE study). Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(5):2454-2464. PMC: 11078784. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10740-y. View

Amin-Tai H, Elnaim A, Wong M, Sagap I . Acquiring Advanced Laparoscopic Colectomy Skills - The Issues. Malays J Med Sci. 2020; 27(5):24-35. PMC: 7605826. DOI: 10.21315/mjms2020.27.5.3. View

Imaizumi K, Ichikawa N, Homma S, Yamamoto K, Ishizuka C, Takahashi R . Effect of Continuous Box-trainer Training on Laparoscopic Skills of Surgical Residents: A Prospective, Observational Study. In Vivo. 2023; 37(1):476-482. PMC: 9843792. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13102. View

10.

Yilmaz E, Soyder A, Aksu M, Bozdag A, Boylu S, Edizsoy A . Contribution of an educational video to surgical education in laparoscopic appendectomy. Turk J Surg. 2017; 33(4):237-242. PMC: 5731557. DOI: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3610. View

11.

Rouhi A, Roberson J, Kindall E, Ghanem Y, Ndong A, Yi W . What are trainees watching? Assessing the educational quality of online laparoscopic cholecystectomy training videos using the LAP-VEGaS guidelines. Surgery. 2023; 174(3):524-528. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.05.021. View

11.

Moriya Y, Sugihara K, Akasu T, Fujita S . Nerve-sparing surgery with lateral node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer. Eur J Cancer. 1995; 31A(7-8):1229-32. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(95)00164-e. View

12.

Wyles S, Miskovic D, Ni Z, Acheson A, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Longman R . Analysis of laboratory-based laparoscopic colorectal surgery workshops within the English National Training Programme. Surg Endosc. 2010; 25(5):1559-66. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1434-y. View

13.

Runkel N, Reiser H . Nerve-oriented mesorectal excision (NOME): autonomic nerves as landmarks for laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013; 28(10):1367-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-013-1705-x. View

14.

Liang J, Lai H, Lee P . Laparoscopic pelvic autonomic nerve-preserving surgery for patients with lower rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14(4):1285-7. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9052-6. View

15.

Jones O, Stevenson A, Stitz R, Lumley J . Preservation of sexual and bladder function after laparoscopic rectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008; 11(5):489-95. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01642.x. View

16.

Bregendahl S, Emmertsen K, Lindegaard J, Laurberg S . Urinary and sexual dysfunction in women after resection with and without preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 17(1):26-37. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12758. View

17.

Jayne D, Brown J, Thorpe H, Walker J, Quirke P, Guillou P . Bladder and sexual function following resection for rectal cancer in a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open technique. Br J Surg. 2005; 92(9):1124-32. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4989. View

18.

Kumazu Y, Kobayashi N, Kitamura N, Rayan E, Neculoiu P, Misumi T . Automated segmentation by deep learning of loose connective tissue fibers to define safe dissection planes in robot-assisted gastrectomy. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):21198. PMC: 8551298. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00557-3. View

19.

Ryu S, Goto K, Kitagawa T, Kobayashi T, Shimada J, Ito R . Real-time Artificial Intelligence Navigation-Assisted Anatomical Recognition in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023; 27(12):3080-3082. PMC: 10837241. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05819-1. View