Impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System on Conversion to Laparotomy After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer in Japan (a Secondary Analysis of the EnSSURE Study)

Overview

Journal Surg Endosc

Publisher Springer

Specialties Gastroenterology
General Surgery
Radiology

Date 2024 Mar 8

PMID 38459211

Authors

Koki Goto

Jun Watanabe

Toshiya Nagasaki

Mamoru Uemura

Heita Ozawa

Yohei Kurose

Tomonori Akagi

Nobuki Ichikawa

Hiroaki Iijima

Masafumi Inomata

Akinobu Taketomi

Takeshi Naitoh

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Aims: Conversion to laparotomy is among the serious intraoperative complications and carries an increased risk of postoperative complications. In this cohort study, we investigated whether or not the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) affects the conversion rate among patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods: We performed a retrospective secondary analysis of data collected from patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for cStage II and III rectal cancer from 2014 to 2016 across 56 institutions affiliated with the Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Data from the original EnSSURE study were analyzed to investigate risk factors for conversion to laparotomy by performing univariate and multivariate analyses based on the reason for conversion.

Results: Data were collected for 3,168 cases, including 65 (2.1%) involving conversion to laparotomy. Indicated conversion accounted for 27 cases (0.9%), while technical conversion accounted for 35 cases (1.1%). The multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for indicated conversion to laparotomy: tumor diameter [mm] (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, p = 0.0002), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/-] (OR 7.92, 95% CI 3.14-19.97, p < 0.0001), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [-/+] (OR 4.46, 95% CI 2.01-9.90, p = 0.0002). The multivariate analysis identified the following risk factors for technical conversion to laparotomy: registered case number of institution (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00, p = 0.0029), institution type [non-university/university hospital] (OR 3.52, 95% CI 1.54-8.04, p = 0.0028), combined resection of adjacent organs [+/-] (OR 5.96, 95% CI 2.15-16.53, p = 0.0006), and surgical participation of an ESSQS-certified physician [-/+] (OR 6.26, 95% CI 3.01-13.05, p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Participation of ESSQS-certified physicians may reduce the risk of both indicated and technical conversion. Referral to specialized institutions, such as high-volume centers and university hospitals, especially for patients exhibiting relevant background risk factors, may reduce the risk of conversion to laparotomy and lead to better outcomes for patients.

Trial Registration: This study was registered with the Japanese Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000040645.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Ryu S, Imaizumi Y, Goto K, Iwauchi S, Kobayashi T, Ito R Surg Endosc. 2025; 39(2):1388-1396.

PMID: 39762611 PMC: 11794642. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11489-0.

Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic rectal surgery: Japanese multicenter analysis.

Ono R, Nonaka T, Tominaga T, Ishii M, Hisanaga M, Araki M Surg Endosc. 2024; 39(1):394-400.

PMID: 39562345 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11407-4.

Comparison of Early Clinical and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Converted Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Aday U, Akbas A, Bayrak F, Sekho Z, Kozgun A, Sevmis M Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65086.

PMID: 39170993 PMC: 11338673. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65086.

References

Kang S, Park J, Jeong S, Nam B, Choi H, Kim D . Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010; 11(7):637-45. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70131-5. View

van der Pas M, Haglind E, Cuesta M, Furst A, Lacy A, Hop W . Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(3):210-8. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70016-0. View

Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M . Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(13):1346-55. PMC: 5140087. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529. View

Stevenson A, Solomon M, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A, Gebski V . Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(13):1356-63. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009. View

Bonjer H, Deijen C, Abis G, Cuesta M, van der Pas M, de Lange-de Klerk E . A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(14):1324-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882. View

Jeong S, Park J, Nam B, Kim S, Kang S, Lim S . Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(7):767-74. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0. View

Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M . Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018; 269(4):589-595. PMC: 6360134. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002. View

Stevenson A, Solomon M, Brown C, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A . Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2018; 269(4):596-602. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021. View

Guillou P, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne D, Smith A . Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005; 365(9472):1718-26. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2. View

10.

Yamamoto S, Fukunaga M, Miyajima N, Okuda J, Konishi F, Watanabe M . Impact of conversion on surgical outcomes after laparoscopic operation for rectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of 1,073 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208(3):383-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.12.002. View

11.

Agha A, Furst A, Iesalnieks I, Fichtner-Feigl S, Ghali N, Krenz D . Conversion rate in 300 laparoscopic rectal resections and its influence on morbidity and oncological outcome. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008; 23(4):409-17. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0425-5. View

12.

Keller D, Khorgami Z, Swendseid B, Champagne B, Reynolds Jr H, Stein S . Laparoscopic and converted approaches to rectal cancer resection have superior long-term outcomes: a comparative study by operative approach. Surg Endosc. 2014; 28(6):1940-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3419-8. View

13.

Jayne D, Pigazzi A, Marshall H, Croft J, Corrigan N, Copeland J . Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017; 318(16):1569-1580. PMC: 5818805. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.7219. View

14.

Furnee E, Aukema T, Oosterling S, Borstlap W, Bemelman W, Tanis P . Influence of Conversion and Anastomotic Leakage on Survival in Rectal Cancer Surgery; Retrospective Cross-sectional Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018; 23(10):2007-2018. PMC: 6773666. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-018-3931-6. View

15.

Sekkat H, Souadka A, Courtot L, Rafik A, Amrani L, Benkabbou A . Available prediction scores of conversion for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery seem to be unsuitable for nowadays rectal cancer management. BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1):162. PMC: 9092680. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01617-9. View

16.

Schwandner O, Schiedeck T, Bruch H . The role of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Do predictive factors exist?. Surg Endosc. 1999; 13(2):151-6. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900927. View

17.

Crippa J, Grass F, Achilli P, Mathis K, Kelley S, Merchea A . Risk factors for conversion in laparoscopic and robotic rectal cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2020; 107(5):560-566. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11435. View

18.

Franko J, OConnell B, Mehall J, Harper S, Nejman J, Zebley D . The influence of prior abdominal operations on conversion and complication rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. JSLS. 2006; 10(2):169-75. PMC: 3016125. View

19.

Zhang G, Zhi X, Zhang J, Bu G, Ma G, Wang K . Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30(9):1209-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2275-x. View

20.

Tekkis P, Senagore A, Delaney C . Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with, 1253 patients. Surg Endosc. 2004; 19(1):47-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8904-z. View