» Articles » PMID: 39760298

Real-world Assessment of the Patient Profile, Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Outcomes Associated with Erythropoietic and X-linked Protoporphyria

Overview
Journal J Dermatol
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2025 Jan 6
PMID 39760298
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Erythropoietic protoporphyria (EPP) and X-linked protoporphyria (XLP) are rare genetic disorders. There are limited data regarding how these disorders are managed in real-world settings. The aim of this study was to document the characteristics and treatment patterns among patients diagnosed with EPP or XLP in general real-world settings in the United States. We, therefore, conducted a retrospective medical record review of patients diagnosed with EPP or XLP on or before July 1, 2020. Data were analyzed for patients with EPP (n = 299) and XLP (n = 91). Outcomes included demographic and clinical characteristics, diagnostic testing, therapy recommendations, office visits, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations. Costs were assigned to healthcare resources. Mean (standard deviation [SD]; median) time between the first symptom documented in the medical records and diagnosis was 2.9 (5.1; 1.3) years. The most common pre-diagnostic tests were liver function, total plasma and erythrocyte protoporphyrin, genetic tests, and renal function. Patients were advised to use sunscreen (85%) or modify their lifestyle (83%). Within 12 months of diagnosis, the mean (SD; median) number of office visits, emergency department visits, and inpatient hospitalizations related to EPP or XLP were 4.0 (3.5; 3.0), 0.8 (1.6; 0), and 0.4 (1.3; 0), respectively. Patients with EPP or XLP have several unmet needs, including timely and accurate diagnosis, symptom relief, and efficacious prevention of phototoxic reactions.

Citing Articles

Real-world assessment of the patient profile, clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes associated with erythropoietic and X-linked protoporphyria.

Silver S, Houghton K, Hitchens A, Ansquer V, Ciepielewska M J Dermatol. 2025; 52(3):416-422.

PMID: 39760298 PMC: 11883737. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.17607.

References
1.
Ventura P, Brancaleoni V, Pierro E, Graziadei G, Macri A, Guida C . Clinical and molecular epidemiology of erythropoietic protoporphyria in Italy. Eur J Dermatol. 2020; 30(5):532-540. DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2020.3880. View

2.
. Porphyrias: photosensitivity and phototherapy. Methods Enzymol. 2000; 319:485-93. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(00)19045-7. View

3.
Wensink D, Langendonk J, Overbey J, Balwani M, Van Broekhoven E, Wagenmakers M . Erythropoietic protoporphyria: time to prodrome, the warning signal to exit sun exposure without pain-a patient-reported outcome efficacy measure. Genet Med. 2021; 23(9):1616-1623. DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01176-z. View

4.
Yasuda M, Chen B, Desnick R . Recent advances on porphyria genetics: Inheritance, penetrance & molecular heterogeneity, including new modifying/causative genes. Mol Genet Metab. 2018; 128(3):320-331. PMC: 6542720. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.11.012. View

5.
Heymans B, Meersseman W . Porphyria: awareness is the key to diagnosis!. Acta Clin Belg. 2021; 77(3):703-709. DOI: 10.1080/17843286.2021.1918876. View