» Articles » PMID: 39758963

Cost-effectiveness of Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib Versus Sorafenib As First-line Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2025 Jan 6
PMID 39758963
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Recent advancements in targeted therapies have improved outcomes for advanced HCC, yet therapeutic options remain limited. The CARES-310 trial demonstrated that camrelizumab plus rivoceranib significantly improves survival compared to sorafenib for advanced HCC.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib as a first-line treatment for unresectable HCC from the Chinese health system perspective.

Design: The cost-effectiveness analysis.

Methods: A partitioned survival model was constructed to estimate clinical and economic outcomes for patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC. The model included three health states: progression-free, progression disease, and death. The hypothetical cohort consisted of patients aged ⩾18 with HCC who had not received systemic therapy, reflecting the CARES-310 trial. Clinical data were derived from the CARES-310 trial and extrapolated using standard parameter distributions. Direct medical costs and utilities were sourced from the CARES-310 trial and published literature.

Results: The 10-year cost of camrelizumab plus rivoceranib was higher than sorafenib (USD 28,148.01 vs USD 20,997.86). Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib yielded an additional 0.26 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) with an incremental cost of USD 7150.15, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of USD 27,633.75/QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base-case results.

Conclusion: Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib is likely a cost-effective first-line treatment for unresectable HCC from a Chinese health system perspective. This study highlights the need for additional real-world data to validate these findings and guide clinical decision-making for HCC.

References
1.
Zhou T, Wang X, Cao Y, Yang L, Wang Z, Ma A . Cost-effectiveness analysis of sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar compared with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):1367. PMC: 9673291. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08661-4. View

2.
Sun B, Xu L, Bi W, Ou W . SALL4 Oncogenic Function in Cancers: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Relevance. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(4). PMC: 8876671. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042053. View

3.
Donisi C, Puzzoni M, Ziranu P, Lai E, Mariani S, Saba G . Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Treatment of HCC. Front Oncol. 2021; 10:601240. PMC: 7874239. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.601240. View

4.
Guyot P, Ades A, Ouwens M, Welton N . Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:9. PMC: 3313891. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-9. View

5.
Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J . Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2018; 391(10127):1301-1314. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30010-2. View