Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib in First-line Treatment of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Randomised Phase 3 Non-inferiority Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: In a phase 2 trial, lenvatinib, an inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1-3, FGF receptors 1-4, PDGF receptor α, RET, and KIT, showed activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to compare overall survival in patients treated with lenvatinib versus sorafenib as a first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
Methods: This was an open-label, phase 3, multicentre, non-inferiority trial that recruited patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, who had not received treatment for advanced disease, at 154 sites in 20 countries throughout the Asia-Pacific, European, and North American regions. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive voice-web response system-with region; macroscopic portal vein invasion, extrahepatic spread, or both; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; and bodyweight as stratification factors-to receive oral lenvatinib (12 mg/day for bodyweight ≥60 kg or 8 mg/day for bodyweight <60 kg) or sorafenib 400 mg twice-daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured from the date of randomisation until the date of death from any cause. The efficacy analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle, and only patients who received treatment were included in the safety analysis. The non-inferiority margin was set at 1·08. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01761266.
Findings: Between March 1, 2013 and July 30, 2015, 1492 patients were recruited. 954 eligible patients were randomly assigned to lenvatinib (n=478) or sorafenib (n=476). Median survival time for lenvatinib of 13·6 months (95% CI 12·1-14·9) was non-inferior to sorafenib (12·3 months, 10·4-13·9; hazard ratio 0·92, 95% CI 0·79-1·06), meeting criteria for non-inferiority. The most common any-grade adverse events were hypertension (201 [42%]), diarrhoea (184 [39%]), decreased appetite (162 [34%]), and decreased weight (147 [31%]) for lenvatinib, and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (249 [52%]), diarrhoea (220 [46%]), hypertension (144 [30%]), and decreased appetite (127 [27%]) for sorafenib.
Interpretation: Lenvatinib was non-inferior to sorafenib in overall survival in untreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. The safety and tolerability profiles of lenvatinib were consistent with those previously observed.
Funding: Eisai Inc.
A novel strategy for sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma: autotaxin Inhibition by PF-8380.
Kwak B, Park J, Kim O, Lee D, Hong T, Lee S J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2025; 151(3):110.
PMID: 40082280 PMC: 11906571. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-025-06156-3.
αKG-induced oxidative stress and mTOR inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for liver cancer.
Choi S, Kim M, You J Med Oncol. 2025; 42(4):105.
PMID: 40080333 PMC: 11906577. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-025-02653-0.
Advances in Immunotherapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Bloom M, Podder S, Dang H, Lin D Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).
PMID: 40076561 PMC: 11900920. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051936.
Zhou Q, Li H, Liang Y, Li R, Wang X, Wang W Radiol Med. 2025; .
PMID: 40072804 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-025-01975-3.
Bu J, Li Z, Hu D, Lan L, Huang J, Wang X Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1554711.
PMID: 40071095 PMC: 11893395. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1554711.