Correlating Disordered Activation Domain Ensembles with Gene Expression Levels

Overview

Journal Biophys Rep (N Y)

Specialty Biophysics

Date 2025 Jan 4

PMID 39755236

Authors

Eduardo Flores

Aleah R Camacho

Estefania Cuevas-Zepeda

Mary B McCoy

Feng Yu

Max V Staller

Shahar Sukenik

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Transcription factor proteins bind to specific DNA promoter sequences and initiate gene transcription. These proteins often contain intrinsically disordered activation domains (ADs) that regulate their transcriptional activity. Like other disordered protein regions, ADs do not have a fixed three-dimensional structure and instead exist in an ensemble of conformations. Disordered ensembles contain sequence-encoded structural preferences that are often linked to their function. We hypothesize that this link exists between the structural preferences of AD ensembles and their ability to induce gene expression. To test this, we measured the ensemble dimensions of two ADs, HIF-1α and CITED2, in live cells using fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy and correlated this structural information with their transcriptional activity. We find that mutations that expanded the ensemble of HIF-1α increased transcriptional activity, while compacting mutations reduced it, highlighting the critical role of structural plasticity in regulating HIF-1α function. Conversely, CITED2 showed no correlation between ensemble dimensions and activity. Our results highlight a possible link between AD ensemble dimensions and their transcriptional activity, with implications for transcriptional regulation and dysfunction.

References

Staller M, Holehouse A, Swain-Lenz D, Das R, Pappu R, Cohen B . A High-Throughput Mutational Scan of an Intrinsically Disordered Acidic Transcriptional Activation Domain. Cell Syst. 2018; 6(4):444-455.e6. PMC: 5920710. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2018.01.015. View

Holehouse A, Das R, Ahad J, Richardson M, Pappu R . CIDER: Resources to Analyze Sequence-Ensemble Relationships of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. Biophys J. 2017; 112(1):16-21. PMC: 5232785. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.11.3200. View

Huang Y, Liu Z . Kinetic advantage of intrinsically disordered proteins in coupled folding-binding process: a critical assessment of the "fly-casting" mechanism. J Mol Biol. 2009; 393(5):1143-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2009.09.010. View

Mirdita M, Schutze K, Moriwaki Y, Heo L, Ovchinnikov S, Steinegger M . ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods. 2022; 19(6):679-682. PMC: 9184281. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1. View

Alerasool N, Leng H, Lin Z, Gingras A, Taipale M . Identification and functional characterization of transcriptional activators in human cells. Mol Cell. 2022; 82(3):677-695.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.12.008. View

Soto L, Li Z, Santoso C, Berenson A, Ho I, Shen V . Compendium of human transcription factor effector domains. Mol Cell. 2021; 82(3):514-526. PMC: 8818021. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.11.007. View

Munoz V, Serrano L . Elucidating the folding problem of helical peptides using empirical parameters. III. Temperature and pH dependence. J Mol Biol. 1995; 245(3):297-308. DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.0024. View

Latchman D . Eukaryotic transcription factors. Biochem J. 1990; 270(2):281-9. PMC: 1131717. DOI: 10.1042/bj2700281. View

Mar M, Nitsenko K, Heidarsson P . Multifunctional Intrinsically Disordered Regions in Transcription Factors. Chemistry. 2023; 29(21):e202203369. DOI: 10.1002/chem.202203369. View

10.

Sanborn A, Yeh B, Feigerle J, Hao C, Townshend R, Aiden E . Simple biochemical features underlie transcriptional activation domain diversity and dynamic, fuzzy binding to Mediator. Elife. 2021; 10. PMC: 8137143. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.68068. View

11.

Yu F, Sukenik S . Structural Preferences Shape the Entropic Force of Disordered Protein Ensembles. J Phys Chem B. 2023; 127(19):4235-4244. PMC: 10201532. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c00698. View

12.

Holehouse A, Kragelund B . The molecular basis for cellular function of intrinsically disordered protein regions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023; 25(3):187-211. PMC: 11459374. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-023-00673-0. View

13.

Vernon R, Chong P, Tsang B, Kim T, Bah A, Farber P . Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation. Elife. 2018; 7. PMC: 5847340. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.31486. View

14.

DelRosso N, Tycko J, Suzuki P, Andrews C, Aradhana , Mukund A . Large-scale mapping and mutagenesis of human transcriptional effector domains. Nature. 2023; 616(7956):365-372. PMC: 10484233. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05906-y. View

15.

Lotthammer J, Ginell G, Griffith D, Emenecker R, Holehouse A . Direct prediction of intrinsically disordered protein conformational properties from sequence. Nat Methods. 2024; 21(3):465-476. PMC: 10927563. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-023-02159-5. View

16.

Vancraenenbroeck R, Harel Y, Zheng W, Hofmann H . Polymer effects modulate binding affinities in disordered proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(39):19506-19512. PMC: 6765308. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904997116. View

17.

Kuravsky M, Kelly C, Redfield C, Shammas S . The transition state for coupled folding and binding of a disordered DNA binding domain resembles the unbound state. Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(19):11822-11837. PMC: 11514473. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae794. View

18.

Boucrot E, Kirchhausen T . Mammalian cells change volume during mitosis. PLoS One. 2008; 3(1):e1477. PMC: 2198941. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001477. View

19.

Zheng W, Dignon G, Brown M, Kim Y, Mittal J . Hydropathy Patterning Complements Charge Patterning to Describe Conformational Preferences of Disordered Proteins. J Phys Chem Lett. 2020; 11(9):3408-3415. PMC: 7450210. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00288. View

20.

Martin E, Holehouse A, Peran I, Farag M, Incicco J, Bremer A . Valence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains. Science. 2020; 367(6478):694-699. PMC: 7297187. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw8653. View